Re: [802.21] Reminder - updated detailed proposals due Jan 9, 2005
Ben,
The whole assumption going into the Phased Approach was that until these phases
start there is active offline harmonization and "meeting of minds" taking place.
So an update from each proposer is mandatory, either in terms of harmonization
effort or an update in terms of more detail for the January meeting.
For March meeting, there is an explicit requirement for more detail including
explanatory text. One could not expect the group to vote on a proposal in phase
II without details in advance.
regards,
-ajay
On 12/13/2004 7:07 PM, Benjamin Koh Tien-Ming wrote:
> Hi!
>
> "
> 3.1.10. Ajay: Encourage people to harmonize their proposals offline and
> come back in Jan with more details. A
> "
> I somehow missed that...
>
> However, is it mandatory to have a presentation for Jan (if we do intend
> to submit something for Phase I & II)? My feeling is that presentations
> in Jan would be more voluntary in nature in order to garner feedback.
> Correct me if the holiday mood is muddling my perceptions again! ;)
>
> Regards,
> Ben
>
>
> Ajay Rajkumar wrote:
>
>>Ben,
>>
>>I agree what holidays, if you are still responding/reading this email!
>>
>>Refer to 3.1.10
>>
>>This was reiteration of what was stated during the meeting.
>>
>>-ajay
>>
>>On 12/12/2004 9:09 PM, Benjamin Koh Tien-Ming wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi!
>>>
>>>Is this update mandatory for all proposers that intend to submit a final
>>>proposal in May?
>>>As per the straw poll in the San Antonio meeting,
>>>
>>>"
>>>3.1.6. How many participants are in favor of Option #3: Evaluation
>>>guideline: Jan 2005; Phase I: Mar 2005; Phase II, May 2005. (For: 25;
>>>Against: 0 Abstain: 3)
>>>"
>>>
>>>So may I ask what is the purpose of the updated proposals in light of
>>>the Phase I in March and Phase II in May?
>>>
>>>Thanks!
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Ben
>>>
>>>Happy Holidays(?) to all reading this... :)
>>>
>>>Ajay Rajkumar wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Folks,
>>>>
>>>>As discussed and decided during the San Antonio meeting, this is just a reminder
>>>>that the updated proposals from the proposers who had originally submitted
>>>>proposals are due by January 9, 2005 (midnight EDT).
>>>>
>>>>These updated proposals are for further consideration and discussion by the group.
>>>>
>>>>Wishing you all Season's Greetings and Happy Holidays.
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>-ajay
>>>>Chair, IEEE 802.21 WG
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>/<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<++>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>| Benjamin Koh Tien-Ming |
>>>| R & D Engineer |
>>>| Panasonic Singapore Laboratories Pte Ltd |
>>>| Tel: (65)6550 5481 Fax: (65)6550 5459 |
>>>| E-mail: benjamin@psl.com.sg |
>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>--<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<</
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> /<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<++>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
> | Benjamin Koh Tien-Ming |
> | R & D Engineer |
> | Panasonic Singapore Laboratories Pte Ltd |
> | Tel: (65)6550 5481 Fax: (65)6550 5459 |
> | E-mail: benjamin@psl.com.sg |
> \>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>--<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<</