RE: [802.21] Minutes: Ad-hoc on IE discussion for Higher Layers (02/14)
Hi Daniel,
To my defense, the minutes do not capture the trail of discussion. The
discussion first started with what is already present in the draft
specification and that included the PoA capabilities information for
IPv4 or IPv6 that is supported in the target network. That was the
issue. It was not related to MM or MIP specifically. The MIP context
came up to indicate that the IP mobility/handover will not work if there
was a mismatch in IP versions.
I do agree on the other goals of 802.21. I am sorry if you feel this
item did not receive fair discussion. I hope in the future we will have
favourable telecon timings to all the participants.
Regards,
Srini
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext Soohong Daniel Park [mailto:soohong.park@SAMSUNG.COM]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 10:36 PM
>To: STDS-802-21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>Subject: Re: [802.21] Minutes: Ad-hoc on IE discussion for
>Higher Layers (02/14)
>
>Catching up with a related thread. First off, sorry for
>missing this call.
>
>1. Discussed IP address config method supported IE proposal
>
> a.. [Kalyan] How the IP address config method supported is
>defined, we need more details about its definition.
> b.. [Qiaobing] I believe that more details about its
>definition can be found in the Commentary submission at the
>Hawaii meeting by Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park).
> c.. [Srini] This information is already available to the MM
>protocol (such as MIP). There is no need for this IE.
> d.. [Qiaobing] Since Daniel is the one who originally
>proposed this IE, he may be able to tell us more about its use
>cases, i.e., under what circumstances this IE will be used.
> e.. [??] Should take into consideration of multiple MM protocols.
>Regarding Kalyan, if we need further address configuration
>methods proposed by somebody, that can be expanded easily.
>Anything else in your mind ?
>
>Srini, which function amongst MIP are you concerinng ? Clarify
>that first, then I will make an explicit reply on that. As I
>indicated many times, 802.21 should ba facilities along with
>MIP. So, don't be biased to any specific protocol when talking
>about at least 802.21 stuff.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
>Mobile Convergence Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Qiaobing Xie" <Qiaobing.Xie@MOTOROLA.COM>
>To: <STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org>
>Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 12:15 PM
>Subject: [802.21] Minutes: Ad-hoc on IE discussion for Higher
>Layers (02/14)
>
>
>> All,
>>
>> Please find the meeting minutes of the ad-hoc attached.
>>
>> Ajay,
>>
>> I'd appreciate it if you could upload the attached meeting
>minutes to
>> the document server.
>>
>> For those who attended the session,
>>
>> Please send me any correction you have. I will update the
>minutes if needed.
>>
>> regards,
>> -Qiaobing
>>
>