RE: [802.21] Ad-hoc on ES/CS discussion
>What happens if the ACK itself is lost?
The source retransmits the same message just after a certain timeout,
just to keep it simple ...
Thanks,
-Srini
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext Gupta, Vivek G [mailto:vivek.g.gupta@INTEL.COM]
>Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 12:29 PM
>To: STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
>Subject: Re: [802.21] Ad-hoc on ES/CS discussion
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: stds-802-21@ieee.org [mailto:stds-802-21@ieee.org] On
>Behalf Of
>> Yoshihiro Ohba
>> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 12:27 PM
>> To: Gupta, Vivek G
>> Cc: Yoshihiro Ohba; Eunah Kim; STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
>> Subject: Re: [802.21] Ad-hoc on ES/CS discussion
>>
><clip>
>>
>> If the tranport is UDP, ACK is needed at MIHF level.
>>
>[Vivek G Gupta]
>Nope.
>You probably need some kind of a protocol for reliable
>transport here which is outside the scope of MIH message passing.
>Just one ACK is not gonna solve that problem.
>What happens if the ACK itself is lost?
>
>
>
>> Regards,
>> Yoshihiro Ohba
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > -Vivek
>> >
>