Re: [802.21] MRPM SG Call for Contributions

[Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@YAHOO.COM>]

Hello Peretz,
  If a member, e.g. Peretz contributes a PAR and 5C document and if we can reach consensus on it in Hawaii, why shouldn't we able to submit it?
  It might have taken long for 802.21 but now we are talking about the extensions to the draft standard 802.21.

Regards,

Behcet

----- Original Message ----
From: "Feder, Peretz (Peretz)" <pfeder@ALCATEL-LUCENT.COM>
To: STDS-802-21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2007 11:30:02 PM
Subject: Re: [802.21] MRPM SG Call for Contributions

Hello Behcet:

 

First SG meeting and we already having a PAR on the agenda?

We didnąt study this topic yet to decide whether it is required.

 

Just recall how many meetings we held before a PAR for 802.21 was submitted.

 

Peretz

 

---

From: Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:behcetsarikaya@YAHOO.COM]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 6:54 PM
To: STDS-802-21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802.21] MRPM SG Call for Contributions

 

802.21 Members,
  The chair has allocated 4-6 hours in Hawaii Interim for MRPM SG. If we need more, probably we can get more.
  MRPM SG has to work on

- a Technical Report on the requirements and architecture,
- PAR and 5Criteria documents

Technical Report, we can structure according to 3GPP TR and an example is TR 22.908
http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/22908.htm
 
  I would like to solicit contributions from the members based on the above.
Please let me know, this will help us organize our time better in the Interim.

Regards,

Behcet