Hi Behcet:
When a member like Peretz is pushing a PAR
before the study group had a clear direction and its study properly conducted,
it raises natural questions about Peretz’s agenda. What is the rush? What
are we missing by studying the topic first?
BR, Peretz Feder
From: Behcet Sarikaya
[mailto:behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007
11:46 AM
To: Feder, Peretz (Peretz)
Cc: STDS-802-21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802.21] MRPM SG Call
for Contributions
Hello Peretz,
If a member, e.g. Peretz contributes a PAR and 5C document and if we can
reach consensus on it in Hawaii,
why shouldn't we able to submit it?
It might have taken long for 802.21 but now we are talking about the
extensions to the draft standard 802.21.
Regards,
Behcet
----- Original Message
----
From: "Feder, Peretz (Peretz)" <pfeder@ALCATEL-LUCENT.COM>
To: STDS-802-21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2007 11:30:02 PM
Subject: Re: [802.21] MRPM SG Call for Contributions
Hello Behcet:
First SG meeting and we already having a
PAR on the agenda?
We didnąt study this topic yet to decide
whether it is required.
Just recall how many meetings we held
before a PAR for 802.21 was submitted.
Peretz
From: Behcet Sarikaya
[mailto:behcetsarikaya@YAHOO.COM]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007
6:54 PM
To: STDS-802-21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802.21] MRPM SG Call for
Contributions
802.21 Members,
The chair has allocated 4-6 hours in Hawaii Interim for MRPM SG. If we
need more, probably we can get more.
MRPM SG has to work on
- a Technical Report on the requirements and architecture,
- PAR and 5Criteria documents
Technical Report, we can structure according to 3GPP TR and an example is TR
22.908
http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/22908.htm
I would like to solicit contributions from the members based on the
above.
Please let me know, this will help us organize our time better in the Interim.
Regards,
Behcet
|