| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Sanjay / Brad,
Great wrap up presentation. It sounds like draft
1.0 coming out of the July 2004 plenary is very optimistic.
Since the 10GBASE-T Objectives will be met with a
single 10GBASE-T PHY do you agree that draft 1.0 should be based on a
unified "single" PHY proposal? If yes, what is
the agreed upon IEEE process to arrive at a single PHY proposal?
With a goal of producing draft 1.0 coming out of
the July 2004 plenary meeting (that's 5-weeks away) it seems like going
into the July plenary meeting that this "10GBASE-T PHY proposal down-selection
process" (i.e. from 5 to 1 or 2) should be agreed upon fairly soon via this
reflector.
Should this process factor in:
Maybe the place to start with on this "agreed
upon down-selection process" is a combination of ranking the above list and
adding to it. In either case it seems obvious that going into the July
meeting this process needs to be defined, or you run the risk of making a
sub-optimum decision or worse yet no decision that results in a delayed
draft 1.0 standard.
-
Jeff
|