Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Marek, The impact of the RF overlay may be modeled (in zero approxiamtion) as increased loss at data signal wavelength since Raman scattering will transfer energy from digital signal to video signal. In the next order approximation one has to take into account transfer of the modulation. I can help you with taking into account zero approximation. SergeyFax +1 607 974 4354 -----Original Message-----
Dear all, since there was no activity in the said ad-hoc for some time, I decided to run the first update of the channel link model spreadsheet (please find it attached in a zipped form - 10GEPON-D.0.0.zip). The main changes included in this release are as follows:
To be added, if required: changing the average splitter type into worst/best case scenario values - preferably with the switch variables defined in the spreadsheet (may be tough to find some space for that though :-9)
As for the other parameters in the spreadsheet: as Dawe suggested previously, we should probably examine the "TP4 offset cell" (T8) which currently follows "Tx mask top" (G14) in similar style to 10GEPBud3_1_16a.xls. Dawe thinks that this cell needs a thorough review and we should adjust its value in such a way that it compensates for the upstream channel burst mode transmission.
Additionally, we should try to numerate the impact of the optional video overlay channel on the overall power budget. Is anyone willing to help me with that ?
Thank You for Your time and attention
Best wishes Marek
Hajduczenia (141238)
|