| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Dear colleagues,
It is only a week before the deadline for submitting presentations.
From Chicago-rule based straw poll results in the last meeting, the
following wavelengths can be considered as candidates of 10GE-PON
downstream wavelegth:
(1) L-band for all PMD classes,
(2) 1.55um if coexistence were not required,
(3) 1.49um if coexistence were not required,
(4) 1.3um.
The candidates (2) and (3) have been mainly proposed by voice, so far.
Dr Frank Effenberger kindly summarized the L-band solutions and
distributed it to the reflector on August 9th. If someone strongly
support other specific wavelengths, such as candidates (2) and (3),
could you prepare presentations summarizing their opinions?
In the next meeting, after lining up all the wavelength proposals, we
would like to narrow down the candidates to decide a specific wavelength
band.
Thank you in advance for your kind cooperation.
Best regards,
Keiji Tanaka
Glen Kramer wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> This is a reminder that the deadline for submitting presentations is
> Monday, September 3rd, 2007.
>
> Please, remember that presentations must be submitted using web form at
> http://www.ieee802.org/3/av/presentproc.html. Post-deadline
> presentations will not be accepted.
>
> Our highest priority items for September meeting are Power Budget and
> Wavelength Allocation.
>
> The deadline for presentation is approaching fast, and yet very little
> discussion happened on the reflector. I would encourage all involved in
> power budget and wavelength ad hocs to resume discussions on the
> reflector. We won't be able to make progress at this meeting if we don't
> find a compromise solution.
>
>
> Thank you,
> Glen
>
>
>