Re: [8023-10GEPON] D1.8022 comments
Eric,
Thanks for your prompt review. I concur with both of your observations
and will include them in the draft.
Best Regards
Duane
Eric Lynskey wrote:
>
> Colleagues,
>
> I’ve been reviewing D1.8022 and I have found a couple of things that
> don’t seem to quite agree with the accepted comment database.
>
> 1. It appears that the resolution to Comment 1457 has not been
> implemented in this draft. I would point out that comments 1456 and
> 1457 are similar comments that apply to Subclause 30.3.2.1.2 and
> 30.3.2.1.3 respectively. I believe the resolution to 1456 has been put
> into this draft and that 1457 was possibly overlooked. The text we
> have in 30.3.2.1.3 should be identical to the text we have in 30.3.2.1.2.
>
> Replace the existing text for 30.3.2.1.3 with the following:
>
> “Add:
>
> 10/1GBASE-PR Clause 92 symmetric 10 Gb/s 64B/66B
>
> 10/1GBASE-PRX Subclause 92.2.1.1 asymmetric 10 Gb/s 64B/66B with 1
> Gb/s 8B/10B”
>
> 2. Editor’s note 3 in Subclause 56.1 on page 30 line 7 is very
> confusing. It is not clear to me what the purpose of this note is, and
> I think it should be removed from the draft. Now that we have added
> all of the Clause 56 material, I think that the note is no longer
> needed. If the note stays as written, it is very likely to create
> confusion and cause numerous comments to be written about it.
>
> Eric Lynskey
>
> Teknovus
>
begin:vcard
fn:Duane R. Remein
n:Remein;Duane R.
org:Alcatel-Lucent;Systems Engineering
adr;dom:;;2301 Sugar Bush Rd.;Raleigh;NC;27613
email;internet:duane.remein@alcatel-lucent.com
tel;work:919 850 6458
url:http://www.alcate.com
version:2.1
end:vcard