Re: [8023-10GEPON] Proposed responses on the web and plan for September meeting
Ah, this is scary, considering this statement is coming from the 802.3av editor. I hope our draft is safe from being mistakenly worked on at FSAN. LOL :)
Glen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marek Hajduczenia [mailto:marek_haj@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 3:20 PM
> To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] Proposed responses on the web and plan for
> September meeting
>
> All,
> I am pretty sure I mistook the 802.3av meeting days with FSAN. FSAN is
> meeting Tuesday - Thursday. Luckily, I am coming in Sunday ...
> Sorry for the confusion - I was after a long 16 hours flight when writign
> the previous email
> Regards
> Marek
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Chang [mailto:ychang@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: domingo, 7 de Setembro de 2008 21:34
> To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] Proposed responses on the web and plan for
> September meeting
>
> Monday Sept 15 is supposed the major holiday ("Chuseok", aka "great
> middle") for Korea. While 10G EPON will meet that day unlike other TFs, so
> I
> feel that is the extra day Glen talking about per the said motion.
> I donot think you are trying 5 days for this interim, which sound scary.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marek Hajduczenia [mailto:marek_haj@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 5:54 AM
> To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] Proposed responses on the web and plan for
> September meeting
>
> Jeff,
> I believe it was indicated that the current sponsor is unable to provide
> an
> extra day for our TF. Am I confusing something ?
> I already made my travel arrangements (flying out on the 19.09) and cannot
> change it. I believe most of the prople also did not account with that
> since
> there was no official announcement on anything related with extra day of
> meeting.
> Regards
> Marek
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Mandin [mailto:Jeff_Mandin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: domingo, 7 de Setembro de 2008 13:23
> To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] Proposed responses on the web and plan for
> September meeting
>
> Glen,
>
> You mention that "we will have four very intense days in Seoul". But I
> don't recall seeing a reflector announcement of the date and location of
> the extra meeting day as indicated in motion #11. What are the
> details?
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Jeff Mandin
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Kramer [mailto:glen.kramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 3:11 AM
> To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [8023-10GEPON] Proposed responses on the web and plan for
> September
> meeting
>
> Dear task force members,
>
> The proposed responses for comments received against draft P802.3av/D2.0
> are
> posted at
> http://www.ieee802.org/3/av/public/2008_09/3av_0809_comments_d2_0_propos
> ed.pdf.
>
> While working on the proposed responses, the editors found it necessary to
> make a number of changes to some of the submitted comments. These changes
> included modifying comment type and/or comment clause to better reflect
> the
> scope of the submitted comment. All such changes are documented in
> http://www.ieee802.org/3/av/public/2008_09/3av_0809_comments_d2_0_change
> s.pdf.
>
> With 742 submitted comments, we will have four very intense days in Seoul.
> To speed up the comment resolution process to be able to resolve all
> comments, throughout the meeting I will ask participants to identify all
> comments they wish to discuss. Since the proposed responses have been
> provided, all responses that did not receive any requests for discussion
> will be accepted by a single motion at the end of the meeting.
>
> Our deadline for any presentations not related to comment resolution, is
> Monday, September 8th, AoE (See
> http://www.ieee802.org/3/av/presentproc.html
> ). However, please keep in mind that our main focus at the September
> meeting
> will be resolving all comments, which is necessary to be able to produce
> draft D2.1 and have a recirculation ballot before the November meeting.
>
> While we have an active ad hoc studying power consumption and potential
> power saving solutions, due to volume of comments I cannot guarantee that
> we
> will have time to hear the ad hoc's report or have any discussion on this
> topic in September. If any time is left after resolving all comments,
> standalone presentations (including that from the power saving ad hoc)
> will
> be allocated timeslots in the order the requests for agenda time were
> made.
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Glen Kramer
> Chair, IEEE P802.3av "10GEPON" Task Force glen.kramer@xxxxxxxx
>
> Glen