Re: [8023-10GEPON] Proposed responses on the web and plan for September meeting
Glen,
Unless I start calling You Kent, You can rest assured that the draft is safe
:)
Now a more serious question: do we provision any time for stand-alone
presentations ? Where I stand right now, with 700+ comments to consider, we
have slim chances to look into stand-alone presentation. Is is worth
submitting one then ?
Regards
Marek
-----Original Message-----
From: Glen Kramer [mailto:glen.kramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: segunda-feira, 8 de Setembro de 2008 1:50
To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] Proposed responses on the web and plan for
September meeting
Ah, this is scary, considering this statement is coming from the 802.3av
editor. I hope our draft is safe from being mistakenly worked on at FSAN.
LOL :)
Glen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marek Hajduczenia [mailto:marek_haj@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 3:20 PM
> To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] Proposed responses on the web and plan for
> September meeting
>
> All,
> I am pretty sure I mistook the 802.3av meeting days with FSAN. FSAN is
> meeting Tuesday - Thursday. Luckily, I am coming in Sunday ...
> Sorry for the confusion - I was after a long 16 hours flight when
> writign the previous email Regards Marek
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Chang [mailto:ychang@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: domingo, 7 de Setembro de 2008 21:34
> To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] Proposed responses on the web and plan for
> September meeting
>
> Monday Sept 15 is supposed the major holiday ("Chuseok", aka "great
> middle") for Korea. While 10G EPON will meet that day unlike other
> TFs, so I feel that is the extra day Glen talking about per the said
> motion.
> I donot think you are trying 5 days for this interim, which sound scary.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marek Hajduczenia [mailto:marek_haj@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 5:54 AM
> To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] Proposed responses on the web and plan for
> September meeting
>
> Jeff,
> I believe it was indicated that the current sponsor is unable to
> provide an extra day for our TF. Am I confusing something ?
> I already made my travel arrangements (flying out on the 19.09) and
> cannot change it. I believe most of the prople also did not account
> with that since there was no official announcement on anything related
> with extra day of meeting.
> Regards
> Marek
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Mandin [mailto:Jeff_Mandin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: domingo, 7 de Setembro de 2008 13:23
> To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] Proposed responses on the web and plan for
> September meeting
>
> Glen,
>
> You mention that "we will have four very intense days in Seoul". But
> I don't recall seeing a reflector announcement of the date and location of
> the extra meeting day as indicated in motion #11. What are the
> details?
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Jeff Mandin
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Kramer [mailto:glen.kramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 3:11 AM
> To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [8023-10GEPON] Proposed responses on the web and plan for
> September meeting
>
> Dear task force members,
>
> The proposed responses for comments received against draft
> P802.3av/D2.0 are posted at
> http://www.ieee802.org/3/av/public/2008_09/3av_0809_comments_d2_0_prop
> os
> ed.pdf.
>
> While working on the proposed responses, the editors found it
> necessary to make a number of changes to some of the submitted
> comments. These changes included modifying comment type and/or comment
> clause to better reflect the scope of the submitted comment. All such
> changes are documented in
> http://www.ieee802.org/3/av/public/2008_09/3av_0809_comments_d2_0_chan
> ge
> s.pdf.
>
> With 742 submitted comments, we will have four very intense days in Seoul.
> To speed up the comment resolution process to be able to resolve all
> comments, throughout the meeting I will ask participants to identify
> all comments they wish to discuss. Since the proposed responses have
> been provided, all responses that did not receive any requests for
> discussion will be accepted by a single motion at the end of the meeting.
>
> Our deadline for any presentations not related to comment resolution,
> is Monday, September 8th, AoE (See
> http://www.ieee802.org/3/av/presentproc.html
> ). However, please keep in mind that our main focus at the September
> meeting will be resolving all comments, which is necessary to be able
> to produce draft D2.1 and have a recirculation ballot before the
> November meeting.
>
> While we have an active ad hoc studying power consumption and
> potential power saving solutions, due to volume of comments I cannot
> guarantee that we will have time to hear the ad hoc's report or have
> any discussion on this topic in September. If any time is left after
> resolving all comments, standalone presentations (including that from
> the power saving ad hoc) will be allocated timeslots in the order the
> requests for agenda time were made.
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Glen Kramer
> Chair, IEEE P802.3av "10GEPON" Task Force glen.kramer@xxxxxxxx
>
> Glen