Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
One thing that isn't repeatable, but is highly informative, is to hang the fiber in loops on a pole and blow it with a fan. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-stds-802-3-10gmmf@IEEE.ORG > [mailto:owner-stds-802-3-10gmmf@IEEE.ORG]On Behalf Of Jonathan King > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 6:52 PM > To: STDS-802-3-10GMMF@listserv.ieee.org > Subject: [10GMMF] Next task 2 meet - paper on Modal Noise on Aerial > fibres - plus an experiment proposal > > > Dear all > good to see many of you in Ottawa at the interim meeting > > Since many are still traveling home, I propose that the next task 2 > (time varying meeting) should take place on > wednesday 13th Oct 9.30am - is that soon enough? please let > me know your > preferences. > (If you feel an earlier meet up is required then we could meet on > wednesday 6th Oct 9.30am - let me know) > > David Cunningham passed on a paper to me at the September interim > showing some dynamic measurements on modal noise for aerial fibres, > which is relevant to task 2 activities. I'll asked Piers to upload it > to the ieee site for reference; alternatively the reference is > > 'Modal-Noise Characteristics in Aerial Optical Cables Subjected to > Vibration', Hiromichi Shinohara, JLT, Vol LT-1,No-4, Dec 1983, > pp535-541. > Anyone want to volunteer to dig into it and summarize ? > > I have a proposal for making measurements of impulse response > change due > to mechanical movement in a quasi-static manner on some real fibres in > the lab: > The process would be: > set up an impulse response measurement test along the lines of the > 'standard link', with a 3ply figure of 8 loop before the main fibre; > move one side of the coil (as in TIA/EIA-455-203 fibre > shaker) stepping > through a reasonable amplitude of motion, and record the impulse > response at each step. It would give a picture of measured IPR > evolution vs perturbation; I also propose that the power > change between > temporal modes vs fibre movement for a few test fibres is > generalized to > help build a model of IPR change vs movement, which in turn > can be used > to build a model of degree of IPR vs frequency (using the GR-63-CORE > vibration mask to relate frequency and amplitude of movement. > > Comments and advice invited > > best wishes > > Jonathan > > tel: 1 408 524 5110 > e-mail: jking@bigbearnetworks.com > fax: 1 408 739 0568 > > Jonathan King > Director, Optical Systems > BigBear Networks > 345 Potrero Avenue > Sunnyvale, CA 94085 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan King > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 4:30 PM > To: STDS-802-3-10GMMF@listserv.ieee.org > Subject: [10GMMF] Participant names and commenst for Task 2 (time > variation) overview slides for September Interim > > Dear all > last call for comments and amendments to the task 2 slide set > for Ottawa > interim......its at: > > http://ieee802.org/3/aq/public/upload/index.html > > file name is > > Task 2 update: Time variation and modal noise study > (22 Sept 04 rev 2, uploaded 23 Sept 04) 175K > > If you'd like your name to be added or deleted please let me know ASAP > the current list of participants (ie those named themselves > at >2 calls > !) > Robert Coenen, David Cunningham , John Dalessasse, Piers > Dawe, Jens Fiedler, Ali Ghiasi, Pete Hallemeier, Jesper > Hanberg, John Jaeger, Jonathan King, Paul Kolesar, Brent Lock, > Tremant Maio, Petar Pepeljugoski, Petre Popescu, Andre Van > Schyndel, > Gary Schaulov, Yu Sun , Norm Swanson, Lars Thon > > hope to see you in Ottawa > best wishes > Jonathan > > tel: 1 408 524 5110 > e-mail: jking@bigbearnetworks.com > fax: 1 408 739 0568 > > Jonathan King > Director, Optical Systems > BigBear Networks > 345 Potrero Avenue > Sunnyvale, CA 94085 >