|
Mike - I know you understand this, but be a bit careful about use of the
word "interferer". To most of us, without other context, it implies amplitude
interference, whereas for this particular topic, we are talking about time
interference (jitter).
Tom
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 9:56
AM
Subject: [10GMMF] TP3 meeting Agenda Nov
2nd
Dear TP3'ers,
Here is the agenda for our mext
meeting
I think we have all changed our clocks this week-end?, in which
case the meeting time remains the same for us all.
Dial in
Details
===============
Tuesday November 2nd at 9am SJ, 5pm UK, 6pm
Germany
Dial in (650) 599-0374, Meeting ID:
136169
Meeting Notes, October
26th
===========================
1. List Attendees
2. Review
meeting notes from last week
3. Agenda additions/changes?
4. Static
Channel Methodology
- Noise loading - update on noise
calculations from Lew
- cbannel selection process
5.
Jitter
- debate pro's and cons on i), ii) and iii)
below:-
i)
define mask and leave it to the implementor to determine what testing is
required
ii) define mask
and give the characteristics for sinusoidal interferer (pk-pk,
frequency)
- this would likely be a high frequency interferer with a separate test for
tracking low freq jitter
iii)
use an approach similar to CEI. Here they use a PN sequence to phase modulate
the signal. This in effect produces a signal which includes a "comb" of
frequencies which are all stressing the Rx at the same time. Key question
around availability of the phase modulating component.
To do list for
future meetings:-
6. Link Budget
7. OMA Measurement methodology
6.
Any other items?
Talk to you tomorrow.
Best
Regards
Mike
|