|
Hi
Tom,
Thanks
for the coaching.
I will
try to make sure that I will try and describe it better on the call tomorrow. I
guess desccribing it as a single frequency source of jitter would have been
better?
Best
Regards
Mike
Mike - I know you understand this, but be a bit careful about use of the
word "interferer". To most of us, without other context, it implies amplitude
interference, whereas for this particular topic, we are talking about time
interference (jitter).
Tom
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 9:56
AM
Subject: [10GMMF] TP3 meeting Agenda
Nov 2nd
Dear TP3'ers,
Here is the agenda for our mext
meeting
I think we have all changed our clocks this week-end?, in
which case the meeting time remains the same for us all.
Dial in
Details
===============
Tuesday November 2nd at 9am SJ, 5pm UK, 6pm
Germany
Dial in (650) 599-0374, Meeting ID:
136169
Meeting Notes, October
26th
===========================
1. List Attendees
2. Review
meeting notes from last week
3. Agenda additions/changes?
4. Static
Channel Methodology
- Noise loading - update on noise
calculations from Lew
- cbannel selection
process
5. Jitter
- debate pro's and cons on i),
ii) and iii) below:-
i) define mask and leave it to the implementor to determine what
testing is required
ii)
define mask and give the characteristics for sinusoidal interferer (pk-pk,
frequency)
- this would likely be a high frequency interferer with a separate test for
tracking low freq jitter
iii)
use an approach similar to CEI. Here they use a PN sequence to phase
modulate the signal. This in effect produces a signal which includes a
"comb" of frequencies which are all stressing the Rx at the same time. Key
question around availability of the phase modulating component.
To do
list for future meetings:-
6. Link Budget
7. OMA Measurement
methodology
6. Any other items?
Talk to you tomorrow.
Best
Regards
Mike
|