|
Hi
Everyone,
Please
ignore this message, it was intended just for Tom.
Best
Regards
Mike
Hi
Tom,
Thanks for the coaching.
I
will try to make sure that I will try and describe it better on the call
tomorrow. I guess desccribing it as a single frequency source of jitter would
have been better?
Best
Regards
Mike
Mike - I know you understand this, but be a bit careful about use of
the word "interferer". To most of us, without other context, it implies
amplitude interference, whereas for this particular topic, we are talking
about time interference (jitter).
Tom
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 9:56
AM
Subject: [10GMMF] TP3 meeting Agenda
Nov 2nd
Dear TP3'ers,
Here is the agenda for our mext
meeting
I think we have all changed our clocks this week-end?, in
which case the meeting time remains the same for us all.
Dial in
Details
===============
Tuesday November 2nd at 9am SJ, 5pm UK, 6pm
Germany
Dial in (650) 599-0374, Meeting ID:
136169
Meeting Notes, October
26th
===========================
1. List Attendees
2. Review
meeting notes from last week
3. Agenda additions/changes?
4. Static
Channel Methodology
- Noise loading - update on
noise calculations from Lew
- cbannel selection
process
5. Jitter
- debate pro's and cons on i),
ii) and iii) below:-
i) define mask and leave it to the implementor to determine
what testing is required
ii) define mask and give the characteristics for sinusoidal
interferer (pk-pk,
frequency)
- this would likely be a high frequency interferer with a separate test
for tracking low freq jitter
iii) use an approach similar to CEI. Here they use a PN sequence to phase
modulate the signal. This in effect produces a signal which includes a
"comb" of frequencies which are all stressing the Rx at the same time. Key
question around availability of the phase modulating component.
To
do list for future meetings:-
6. Link Budget
7. OMA Measurement
methodology
6. Any other items?
Talk to you
tomorrow.
Best
Regards
Mike
|