This comment relates to the format of
the table rather than the content. I find the table inconsistent
and confusing because a launch type is entered under the column entitled
"fibre type". For consistency and clarity the Universal
Launch entry belongs in its own column along side the other launch type
columns.
Regards,
Paul Kolesar
SYSTIMAX® SOLUTIONS
1300 East Lookout Drive
Richardson, TX 75082
Phone: 972.792.3155
Fax: 972.792.3111
eMail: pkolesar@systimax.com
Jonathan King <jking@BIGBEARNETWORKS.COM> Sent by: owner-stds-802-3-10gmmf@IEEE.ORG
01/14/2005 09:32 PM
Please respond to
"IEEE P802.3aq 10GBASE-LRM" <stds-802-3-10gmmf@IEEE.ORG>
To
STDS-802-3-10GMMF@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
cc
Subject
Re: [10GMMF] Task 2 and 4 Launch study
group - table of primary and alternative launches vs fibre type
Dear all
here is a revision of the table of recommended launches vs fibre type,
following comments and discussion on the Jan 12th call, I've added in
the alternative launches and EF definitions, including the revised EF
radii noted by David Cunningham in his comments to Draft 1.0
Please let me know of any errors or comments you have as soon as
possible before the next call (Weds 19th Jan).