IEEE P802.3ae 10Gb/s Ethernet Task Force
Email Archive

Date Index (Page 98 of 114)

RE: Proposal for accomodating 10.0000 and 9.58464 line rates
- From: Rigsbee, Everett O
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 02:25:23 -0400
Re: Ethernet over WANs
- From: NetWorthTK
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 00:21:06 -0400
Re: Proposal for accomodating 10.0000 and 9.58464 line rates
- From: NetWorthTK
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 00:17:36 -0400
Re: Data rate standards vs internal switching standards
- From: Ariel Hendel
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 18:30:03 -0400
Ethernet over WANs
- From: Rohit Mittal
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 17:02:24 -0400
Re: Proposal for accomodating 10.0000 and 9.58464 line rates
- From: Dan Dove
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:35:24 -0400
RE: More on this 10/9.58464 data rate...
- From: Booth, Brad
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:28:20 -0400
Re: 9.584640
- From: Dan Dove
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:15:04 -0400
RE: Proposal for accomodating 10.0000 and 9.58464 line rates
- From: Chang, Edward S
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 13:51:05 -0400
Re: More on this 10/9.58464 data rate...
- From: Dan Dove
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 13:30:14 -0400
Re: Data rate standards vs internal switching standards
- From: Roy Bynum
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 13:28:30 -0400
Re: Proposal for accomodating 10.0000 and 9.58464 line rates
- From: Dan Dove
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 13:12:03 -0400
Re: Proposal for accomodating 10.0000 and 9.58464 line rates
- From: Dan Dove
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 13:01:15 -0400
Re: Data rate standards vs internal switching standards
- From: Ariel Hendel
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:54:53 -0400
RE: Data rate standards vs internal switching standards
- From: Booth, Brad
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 12:44:50 -0400
Data rate standards vs internal switching standards
- From: Roy Bynum
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 11:10:40 -0400
RE: Leveraging OC-192c
- From: Chang, Edward S
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 09:41:24 -0400
Nomenclature
- From: Joe Gwinn
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 12:07:10 -0400
Nomenclature for RTFC in 10GbE
- From: Joe Gwinn
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 12:07:07 -0400
Re: Does Ten-Gigabit Ethernet need fault tolerance? (nonredundant NICs)
- From: Brian MacLeod
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 22:42:45 -0400
Re: Does Ten-Gigabit Ethernet need fault tolerance? (nonredundant NICs)
- From: Joe Gwinn
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 14:26:54 -0400
Re: Does Ten-Gigabit Ethernet need fault tolerance? (nonredundant NICs)
- From: Joe Gwinn
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 14:22:04 -0400
RE: Leveraging OC-192c
- From: Hon Wah Chin
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 12:16:15 -0400
Re: Does Ten-Gigabit Ethernet need fault tolerance? (nonredundant NICs)
- From: Roy Bynum
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 00:26:05 -0400
Re: Does Ten-Gigabit Ethernet need fault tolerance? (nonredundant NICs)
- From: Roy Bynum
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 20:59:49 -0400
RE: Leveraging OC-192c
- From: Grow, Bob
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 14:05:15 -0400
Re: Leveraging OC-192c - 802.3x flow control
- From: Rich Taborek
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 13:13:52 -0400
RE: Leveraging OC-192c - 802.3x flow control
- From: Hon Wah Chin
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 12:18:34 -0400
Re: Leveraging OC-192c - 802.3x flow control
- From: Rich Taborek
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 14:23:43 -0400
Leveraging OC-192c
- From: Hon Wah Chin
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 13:50:29 -0400
Re: 9.584640
- From: Rich Taborek
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 13:17:47 -0400
Re: Does Ten-Gigabit Ethernet need fault tolerance? (nonredundant NICs)
- From: Joe Gwinn
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 12:00:30 -0400
RE: PHYs with 10.000 and 9.584640
- From: Thirion, Walt
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 00:29:12 -0400
RE: PHYs with 10.000 and 9.584640
- From: Thirion, Walt
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 00:29:09 -0400
RE: PHYs with 10.000 and 9.584640
- From: Booth, Brad
- Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 11:32:25 -0400
Re: Proposal for accommodating 10.0000 and 9.58464 line rates
- From: Paul Bottorff
- Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 01:00:44 -0400
Re: On two clock issue
- From: Roy Bynum
- Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 22:43:36 -0400
Re: Does Ten-Gigabit Ethernet need fault tolerance? (POP review advice)
- From: Roy Bynum
- Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 22:14:53 -0400
Re: Proposal for accomodating 10.0000 and 9.58464 line rates
- From: Roy Bynum
- Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 22:00:51 -0400
Re: Does Ten-Gigabit Ethernet need fault tolerance?
- From: Roy Bynum
- Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 21:50:04 -0400
Re: 9.584640
- From: Roy Bynum
- Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 21:37:26 -0400
Re: PHYs with 10.000 and 9.584640
- From: Roy Bynum
- Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 21:27:51 -0400
Re: Does Ten-Gigabit Ethernet need fault tolerance? (POP review advice)
- From: Joe Gwinn
- Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 16:50:34 -0400
Re: Does Ten-Gigabit Ethernet need fault tolerance?
- From: Joe Gwinn
- Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 14:40:49 -0400
Re: FW: Proposal for accomodating 10.0000 and 9.58464 line rates
- From: Peter_Wang
- Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 04:24:08 -0400
re: PHYs with 10.000 and 9.584640
- From: Paul Bottorff
- Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 01:51:08 -0400
More on this 10/9.58464 data rate...
- From: Booth, Brad
- Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 23:25:08 -0400
FW: Proposal for accomodating 10.0000 and 9.58464 line rates
- From: Mick Seaman
- Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 22:15:38 -0400
RE: 9.584640
- From: Perkins, Drew
- Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 22:04:12 -0400
Re: 802.3x flow control
- From: Devendra Tripathi
- Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 22:00:17 -0400

Return to top of Page

Return to IEEE P802.3ae 10Gb/s Ethernet Task Force area

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.8

IEEE P802.3ae 10Gb/s Ethernet Task ForceEmail Archive

Date Index (Page 98 of 114)

IEEE P802.3ae 10Gb/s Ethernet Task Force
Email Archive