Re: 10 Gigabit EMI
Dan,
The current XAUI/XGXS proposal specifies and Idle which bears no resemblance to
the "hot" FC Idle. I'm not quite sure why its being blasted without proper
evaluation. It may or may not need further improvement, but it should be
evaluated first.
Best Regards,
Rich
--
"DOVE,DANIEL J (HP-Roseville,ex1)" wrote:
> > Up to Gig E, we have had the luxury (admittedly, with a fair
> > amount of pain) of having a "convenience based, user
> > friendly" box design. With 10 Gig, have we finally hit the wall?
>
> This might have been said about 10 or 100 or 1000. We will see. Rather
> than choose a "spikey" code and roll the dice, I would recommend
> using careful consideration for the code.. then roll the dice. :)
>
> I liken EMI design to firefighting.. It is better to prevent fires,
> than try to to contain them.
>
> 8B10B might be too hot to handle without some improvements.
>
> Dan
-------------------------------------------------------
Richard Taborek Sr. Phone: 408-845-6102
Chief Technology Officer Cell: 408-832-3957
nSerial Corporation Fax: 408-845-6114
2500-5 Augustine Dr. mailto:rtaborek@xxxxxxxxxxx
Santa Clara, CA 95054 http://www.nSerial.com