Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

RE: WAN PHY name

To: "Edward Chang" <edward.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: WAN PHY name
From: jay.hoge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 17:18:21 +0100
cc: "Paul Bottorff" <pbottorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gary Nicholl" <gnicholl@xxxxxxxxx>, "Jonathan Thatcher" <Jonathan.Thatcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "HSSG_reflector (E-mail)" <stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxx




One more time, Telecom oriented applications (inclusive of SONET Lite and
SDH Lite) might be expected to be where the "WAN PHY" will be used. Lacking
a better proposal, I still vote for the Telecom PHY.

Prev by Date: RE: What is 802.3ae WAN-PHY?
Next by Date: RE: WAN PHY name
Prev by thread: RE: WAN PHY name
Next by thread: RE: WAN PHY name
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread