Re: PMD discussion
Rich,
Now I am confused. It was my understanding that the LAN only PHY would be using 64b/66b, just like what is being forced on the WAN
compatible PHY. If so, then it was my understanding that the parallel/CWDM PMD would also be 64b/66b.
Thank you,
Roy Bynum
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rich Taborek" <rtaborek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "HSSG" <stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2000 2:35 AM
Subject: Re: PMD discussion
>
> Ed,
>
> Done! I completely agree to drop this tangent and focus on PMD issues.
>
> Best Regards,
> Rich
>
> --
>
> NetWorthTK@xxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > Rich:
> >
> > I believe you misunderstood my mail to conclude your comments too quickly.
> >
> > I never mentioned that I like the 12.5 Gbps 8B/10B coding to be replaced by
> > 10.3125 Gbps 64b/66b.
> >
> > We are discussing serial vs parallel issues.
> >
> > We are too much involved in resolving PMD issues right now, and I believe no
> > one is interested in bring the coding scheme back to reflector at this moment.
> >
> > Please do not intiate this one. let us focuse on PMD issues.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ed Chang
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Richard Taborek Sr. Phone: 408-845-6102
> Chief Technology Officer Cell: 408-832-3957
> nSerial Corporation Fax: 408-845-6114
> 2500-5 Augustine Dr. mailto:rtaborek@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Santa Clara, CA 95054 http://www.nSerial.com