Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: From serial PMD call, 8 May



wow... i don't know about anyone else, but for me this article marks
the first-observed use of "lowest possible priority", and it's a bit
refreshing to see this, in a "do it yesterday" world.

(we now resume the regularly-scheduled e-cast...)
--
jmw

At 07:12 PM 17-05-01 +0200, DAWE,PIERS (A-England,ex1) wrote:

For the record; my apologies for being late with these minutes.

Box level spec and double counting of receiver eye opening penalty
------------------------------------------------------------------
The draft standard and the link model, copying 1GE where PMD and PMA were
separate, defines the stressed receive sensitivity as 0.4 dB below the worst
Tx power less worst attenuation.  The 0.4 dB, "TP4 Eye Opening" is for the
PMA.
This time at 10G we think we are writing an equipment level standard so it
would be reasonable to test a combined PMD/PMA without that correction.
This consideration may affect the power for a receiver jitter tolerance
test.
[...]