| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Yair,
Autoclass is not defined for dual-signature PDs. Not in 4P mode, not in 2P mode.
A PSE, when operating in 2-pair mode is defined using PClass, not PClass-2P.
This change is not needed.
Kind regards,
Lennart From: George Zimmerman <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 0:41 To: STDS-802-3-4PPOE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [802.3_4PPOE] Comment #60 - Updates for PD specifications 145.3.8.2, 145.3.8 Minor comments - suggesting a slightly different text change – simply editorial, so that it reads correctly (inserted text shown by underline) Instead of: "PDs may also adjust their maximum required operating power below PClass_PD or PClass_PD-2P (when dual-signature PD operates over 2-pairs) by using Autoclass (see 145.3.6.2)." "PDs may also adjust their maximum required operating power below PClass_PD (or PClass_PD-2P when a dual-signature PD operates over 2-pairs) by using Autoclass (see 145.3.6.2)."
I think this just makes it clearer, however, the next change is more important editorially (and,could get you comments if not made)
I would make is rather than say “above equation” in 145.3.8.4, you should refer to the Equation number (as a cross reference). Saying “above equation” puts you at the mercy of an editor or framemaker moving the equation around relative to the text.
-george
From: Yair Darshan [mailto:YDarshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Hi guys, Please see attached. I’ll appreciate your review. Thanks Yair
Darshan Yair Chief R&D Engineer Analog Mixed Signal Group Microsemi Corporation
1 Hanagar St., P.O. Box 7220
Cell: +972-54-4893019
E-mail: <mailto:ydarshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
|