Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Ahmad, Unfortunately, I was not able to find the material in the presentation supporting some of the statements on slide 11. For
example, I could not locate the source for the statement: “Removing echo canceller saves up to 80% of the DSP area.” Is this based on measurements from existing products, similar to previous presentations
https://www.ieee802.org/3/dm/public/0524/Evaluation%20of%20802.3ch_Tran_050142024a.pdf , or is it based on a particular model? If it is the latter, I would appreciate more details about the system and its assumptions. Best regards, From: Ahmad Chini <chiniahmad.ieee@xxxxxxxxx>
Alireza Please see in the presentation, the comparison is for DSP cost and active power. Any other analysis would be TBD future work. Thanks Ahmad Sent from Mail
for Windows From: Alireza RazaviSent: Wednesday, July 17, 2024 2: 29 PMTo: STDS-802-3-ISAAC@ listserv. ieee. orgSubject:
Alireza Please see in the presentation, the comparison is for DSP cost and active power. Any other analysis would be TBD future work. Thanks Ahmad Sent from
Mail for Windows From: Alireza Razavi Ahmad/Mehmet
Thank you for your presentation.
Could you provide more details about your assumptions for the materials in slide 11? Additionally, can your model or measurement compare the
average and maximum power of the PHY on the camera side for EEE and time division mode? Furthermore, you compared two methods for the 2.5G/100M mode. How do these numbers change for the 10G/100M mode? Best Alireza To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1 |