Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802.3_ISAAC] [EXTERNAL] [802.3_ISAAC] Comments on "Impact of Duplexing Methods on RFI Immunity in Camera Links"

Hi Frank,

Thank you for your input. For this test, EMI noise is in-band for both ACT and ASA_MLE design. Both designs require a similar hardware to compensate the effect of this noise.

Best

Alireza

 

 

From: Frank Wang (王順生) <frank.wang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2024 7:02 PM
To: STDS-802-3-ISAAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [802.3_ISAAC] Comments on "Impact of Duplexing Methods on RFI Immunity in Camera Links"

 

Hi Alireza, Thank you very much for your presentation this afternoon. On the slide 6 (Narrow-band RFI immunity), I want to remind that there is also a very important EMC test standard, IEC62228-5. In this EMC test standard, Direct Power Injection

Hi Alireza,

 

Thank you very much for your presentation this afternoon. On the slide 6 (Narrow-band RFI immunity), I want to remind that there is also a very important EMC test standard, IEC62228-5. In this EMC test standard, Direct Power Injection (DPI) test has maximum RFI power between 8MHz and 88MHz. Beyond 88MHz, the RFI power decreases slowly with increase in RFI frequency. Since the range of maximum RFI power covers most the in-band of ACT, do you think the ACT US receiver needs no any signal processing, e.g., equalizer and/or echo canceller, for the test?

 

Regards,

Frank

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1