| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Please pull the following comments:
#28 was intended to be Proposed Reject (Tx/Rx PCS are simultaneous as XGMII is full-duplex)
#112 proposed resolution mentions transmitting the Z symbols on the MDI, but there was further discussion on best wording for 202.4.3.1 for Z symbols mapping from PMA service interface to MDI.
- Likely resolution is to refer to 202.5.2.4 contingent on EZ resolution of comment #260 which also defines Tx MDI behavior when tx_symb=Z, or use similar wording in both places.
The following could just be updated as below and remain EZ, or could be pulled if appropriate:
#39 proposed response says accommodated by #238, but should be accommodated by #184 and #185
#154 proposed remedy to replace “normal mode” with “data mode” can also be applied to Clause 202 (with editorial license)
Thanks
Scott
---
Scott Muma
Senior Technical Staff Architect
Microchip Technology, Inc.
Email: scott.muma@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1