| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
William – I would rather suggest that we define the bit in the positive sense. Otherwise, if the FOLLOWER never acquires the timing reference, under your definition, timing_lock_OK would be set to 1, because
you can’t lose what you never have. This is, however, not what I think we want. Also, style manual says you spell out zero & one, and I believe we have another comment to not put LEADER and FOLLOWER in all caps… Insert text in 191.5.2.6 (page 116) after line 28. The timing_lock_OK bit transmitted by the Follower in the infofield to indicate whether the Follower is currently tracking the Leader’s timing reference. This indicator bit is set to one to indicate that a Follower is tracking the Leader’s
timing reference and is set to zero otherwise. George Zimmerman, Ph.D. President & Principal CME Consulting, Inc. Experts in Advanced PHYsical Communications 310-920-3860 From: William Lo <00005d57449a68e9-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
All, I took an action to get some wording to define timing_lock_OK.
Insert text in 191.5.2.6 (page 116) after line 28. Whenever a FOLLOWER loses the LEADER's timing reference it sets timing_lock_OK=0, which is communicated to the link partner via the InfoField. Otherwise, timing_lock_OK is set to 1. Thanks, William To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1 |