| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Folks, One more addition to the agenda. If time allows after the PAR discussion, we’ll transition to discussion of the Criteria for Standards Development (CSD):
·
CSD Discussion
o
Review documents “NG-EPON 5Criteria - R01.pptx” and “201509Remein_NG-EPON ad hoc summary and CSDs.pptx” located here:
§
https://owncloud.cablelabs.com/public.php?service=files&t=4951cd9a35045bade1c1b0729eecaac0 From: Curtis Knittle [mailto:C.Knittle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Colleagues, Please see agenda below. Note there are several items I hope you’ll review before attending the meeting so we can be most efficient.
·
Review of Guidelines for IEEE-SA meetings.
o
https://development.standards.ieee.org/myproject/Public/mytools/mob/preparslides.pdf
·
CSD/PAR/Objectives timeline
·
Study Group Objectives
o
Review Current version (R07) located here:
§
https://owncloud.cablelabs.com/public.php?service=files&t=4951cd9a35045bade1c1b0729eecaac0
o
Comments on current objectives:
§
“Provide physical layer specifications operating over a single SMF strand and supporting” makes it sound as if the said specifications operate over SMF, which is clearly not the intent.
I would suggest the following wording instead: “Provide physical layer specifications for operation over a single SMF strand and supporting”
§
“MAC data rate” is repeated in three 2nfd level bullets. Suggest to change “supporting” to “supporting the MAC data rate of:” and strike ‘MAC data rate of’ in three 2nd level
bullets
§
“Provide an extensible architecture that will support future higher MAC data rates of at least 100 Gb/s” – we do not “provide” architecture, but rather define it in the spec. There
is also no need to state “higher” since it is implied by 100 Gb/s target already. Suggest to reword as follows: “Define an extensible architecture to support future MAC data rates of at least 100 Gb/s”
o
Co-existence objective proposal:
§
Support coexistence with 10G-EPON
·
Power budgets equivalent to 10G-EPON power budgets defined in 802.3-2015
·
Wavelength allocation allowing concurrent operation with 10G-EPON PHYs
§
·
PAR Scope and Purpose contribution – Duane
o
Review the document “201509Remein_NG-EPON Project Scope Purpose.pdf” located here:
§
https://owncloud.cablelabs.com/public.php?service=files&t=4951cd9a35045bade1c1b0729eecaac0
·
Reminder - Call for Contributions
·
Contributions needed
·
Open 11:30 – 1:30 MDT 1. Please join my meeting. https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/333639325 2. Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended. Or, call in using your telephone. Dial +1 (872) 240-3212 Access Code: 333-639-325 Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting Meeting ID: 333-639-325 Curtis Knittle Director, Optical Technologies CableLabs 858 Coal Creek Circle Louisville, CO 80027 Office: 303-661-3851 Mobile: 303-589-6869 Email:
c.knittle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |