Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802.3_OMEGA] Comments on P802.3cz project documents

Bob,

I would like to know what is meant in other projects with "The balance of costs between infrastructure and attached stations is not applicable to the automotive environment.”. What is infrastructure and what is station and what is the rational behind this requirement. Understanding well these points
are the basis to build an answer to the comment.

Thanks


Rubén Pérez-Aranda 
CTO at KDPOF
_____________________________________________________________

Knowledge Development for POF, S.L.
A: Ronda de Poniente 14 2º CD, 28760, Tres Cantos (Madrid), Spain 
P: +34 91 804 33 87 Ext:110 
M: +34 689 319 866



El 2020 may12, a las 21:58, ROBERT GROW <bobgrow@xxxxxxx> escribió:

Colleagues:

As mentioned on our 12 March teleconference, we have received PAR and CSD comments from 802.11.  See slide 13 of mentor document 11-20/264r3:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-0264-03-0PAR-par-review-sc-meeting-agenda-and-comment-slides-march-2020-atlanta.pptx.

We just received comments from 802.1.  P802.3cz and P802.3cy have the same CSD-Economic Feasibility response and received the same comment.  The comment document is:  http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2020/admin-PAR-CSD-comments-802-3-0520-v02.pdf and the two comments are slides 3 and 4.  

The 802.11 comments will not require changes to our PAR or CSD.  If you have any suggestions for a response on the 802.1 comment, I’m open to hearing it, and will work with the B10GAUTO leaders to draft a common response.

—Bob Grow
________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-OMEGA list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-OMEGA&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-OMEGA list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-OMEGA&A=1