Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Dear all, I reviewed the results of my straw polls of August 3rd 802.3cz AdHoc meeting, which have been published in the minutes. In general, I understand the abstains due to lack of expertise and the abstains for being neutral, provided that these abstains are not transformed with no reason in negative votes in the corresponding future motions. However, I do not understand abstains based on the necessity of more information, because every question asked during my contributions were answered by me, and for some of the baseline proposals even no questions were received. On the other hand, I did not receive any opposition against the proposals of BER test mode, loopback modes and EEE. I would like to understand the negative votes and solve the technical reasons behind. For the 50G PCS/PMA proposal, we had several discussions and additional contribution was presented by me giving answers to not asked questions. You should understand that is impossible for me to imagine which kind of information is missed by you if no questions are asked. The following participants are requested to send specific questions so that I can provide the additional information that is missed by abstainers and that is needed by negative voters to understand the proposals. I will be pleased to elaborate specific contributions to address the questions. Straw poll 1: BER test mode proposal
Straw poll 2: Loopback modes proposal
Straw poll 3: EEE proposal
Straw poll 4: 50 Gb/s PCS/PMA proposal
Thank you and best regards, Rubén Pérez-Aranda CTO at KDPOF _____________________________________________________________ Knowledge Development for POF, S.L. A: Ronda de Poniente 14 2º CD, 28760, Tres Cantos (Madrid), Spain P: +34 91 804 33 87 Ext:110 M: +34 689 319 866 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-OMEGA list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-OMEGA&A=1 |