Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[802.3_OMEGA] What happened:　Re: [802.3_OMEGA] Request for specific questions on straw polls of August 3rd

All,

I returned from my off-days and found Ruben's mail and presentation today, that is very surprising.

I just answered to his straw polls and my name is listed in his presentation, saying, hey these people answered "no" to my questions.

Also "abstain" is just "abstain" just because I am not confident to say "yes". Is it a violation to something?

Ruben, Stop doing this.

Bob, Is this allowed to list up people in the official presentation just because we say no (moreover just abstain)?

I apologize if may saying violates IEEE rules because I'm not a native.

Thank you.

Ichiro

On 2021/08/06 6:25, Rubén Pérez-Aranda wrote:
Dear all,

I reviewed the results of my straw polls of August 3rd 802.3cz AdHoc meeting, which have been published in the minutes.

In general, I understand the abstains due to lack of expertise and the abstains for being neutral, provided that these abstains 
are not transformed with no reason in negative votes in the corresponding future motions. 

However, I do not understand abstains based on the necessity of more information, because every question asked 
during my contributions were answered by me, and for some of the baseline proposals even no questions were received. 

On the other hand, I did not receive any opposition against the proposals of BER test mode, loopback modes and EEE. I would like 
to understand the negative votes and solve the technical reasons behind. 

For the 50G PCS/PMA proposal, we had several discussions and additional contribution was presented by me giving answers to 
not asked questions.

You should understand that is impossible for me to imagine which kind of information is missed by you if no questions 
are asked.

The following participants are requested to send specific questions so that I can provide the additional information that is missed
by abstainers and that is needed by negative voters to understand the proposals.

I will be pleased to elaborate specific contributions to address the questions.

Straw poll 1: BER test mode proposal

Straw poll 2: Loopback modes proposal

Straw poll 3: EEE proposal
  • Abstains that need more information:
    • Richard Pitwon Resolute Photonics
    • Masato Shiino, FURUKAWA
    • Takeo Masuda [OITDA/PETRA]
  • Negative votes:
    • Ichiro Ogura PETRA

Straw poll 4: 50 Gb/s PCS/PMA proposal 
  • Abstains that need more information:
    • Richard Pitwon Resolute Photonics
    • Michikazu Aono - Yazaki
    • Masato Shiino, FURUKAWA
    • Yasuhiro Hyakutake, Adamant Namiki Precision Jewel
    • Nobuyasu Araki YAZAKI
    • Tomohiro Kikuta Adamant Namiki Precision Jewel Co., Ltd.
    • Manabu Kagami - NITech
    • Taiji Kondo, MegaChips
    • Hideki Isono Fujitsu Optical Components
    • Takehiro Hayashi HAT Lab - independent
  • Negative votes:
    • Takeo Masuda [OITDA/PETRA]
    • Shigeru Kobayashi, AIO Core
    • Hideki Goto Toyota


Thank you and best regards,



Rubén Pérez-Aranda 
CTO at KDPOF
_____________________________________________________________

Knowledge Development for POF, S.L.
A: Ronda de Poniente 14 2º CD, 28760, Tres Cantos (Madrid), Spain 
P: +34 91 804 33 87 Ext:110 
M: +34 689 319 866

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-OMEGA list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-OMEGA&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-OMEGA list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-OMEGA&A=1