RE: [10GBASE-CX4] Preparation for the Ottawa Interim
Hi Pat,
Thank you for sending us your acceptance/response to your
resolutions. We will consider them and make every effort to
satisfy your remaining concerns.
I appreciate you sending them prior to the meeting so that we
can hopefully resolve the remaining concerns within this cycle.
Regards,
Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pat_thaler@agilent.com [mailto:pat_thaler@agilent.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:25 PM
> To: dan.dove@hp.com; stds-802-3-10GBCX4@ieee.org
> Subject: RE: [10GBASE-CX4] Preparation for the Ottawa Interim
>
>
> Status on my TRs:
>
> 448 accept
>
> 453 accept
>
> 456 grudgingly accept. It would be less confusing if you
> removed the factor of 0.5 in the waveform normalization. This
> would change the scale so that the 1 level would be where the
> 0.5 level is now. Or if you really feel there is some magic
> in the normalized 1 being near the voltage, then divide by 4
> instead of 2 to produce Vnorm. It seems silly to divide by 2
> in one equation and then divide by 2 in another equation when
> one could have divided by 4 in the first place.
>
> 451 accept
>
> 452 accept though it is a little confusing that OK detection
> time is specified separately from OK assertion time but FAIL
> detection and deassertion are combined into one spec. I
> understand the reason for the difference, but the text could
> make it more clear.
>
> 459 accept
>
> NOT RESOLVED:
> 457 - the receiver jitter tolerance section seeems to be
> missing from draft 4.02. Since this is a necessary
> specification, the comment is still unresolved.
> 458 - this comment is still open. It is not clear that jitter
> has been adequately addressed.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DOVE,DANIEL J (HP-Roseville,ex1) [mailto:dan.dove@hp.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:00 PM
> To: 10GBASE-CX4 (E-mail)
> Subject: [10GBASE-CX4] Preparation for the Ottawa Interim
>
>
>
> Hello Task Force Members,
>
> Our editorial crew, led by Howard Baumer has reviewed the task force
> internal document 4.01 and revised it to create 4.02 which I
> have posted at
>
> http://www.ieee802.org/3/ak/private/drafts/d4.02/index.html
>
> In addition, I have posted an Excel spreadsheet provided by
> Gary Oleynick
> which contains useful data on cable assembly S-parameters.
>
> Please jump over to the website, download the material, and
> begin reviewing
> it so that we can make good progress in Ottawa.
>
> I have received a few requests for time to present at the meeting.
> Presentations will be contingent upon time and direct
> relevance to resolving
> comments from D4.0. If you have not contacted me yet but have
> material that
> you believe should be shared, contact me immediately so we
> can discuss how
> to proceed with it.
>
> I believe we are in shape to complete comment resolution and
> get D4.1 out to
> recirculation from this meeting.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Dan Dove
> Chair, 802.3ak
> ======================================
> Principal Engineer, LAN PHY Technology
> dan.dove@hp.com
> hp ProCurve Networking Business
> 8000 Foothills Blvd. MS 5555
> Roseville, CA 95747-5555
> Phone: 916 785 4187
> Fax : 916 785 1815
> ======================================
>