----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 1:29
PM
Subject: Re: [BP] Parameter input to
signaling spreadsheet
I do not want to include tap
value settings. We consider our algorithm for optimizing these values to
be proprietary, and perhaps other vendors will as well. I'm sure it
would be interesting additional information were everyone to provide it, but I
don't believe it would weigh on a decision process.
Thanks,
Joe
Joe Abler
abler@us.ibm.com
IBM Microelectronics
Division
919-254-0573
Technical Marketing & HSS Applications
919-254-9616 (fax)
3039 Cornwallis Road
Research Triangle Park,
NC 27709
| Brian Brunn
<Brian.Brunn@XILINX.COM> Sent by: owner-stds-802-3-blade@listserv.ieee.org
11/30/2004 10:49 AM Please respond to Brian Brunn
| To:
STDS-802-3-BLADE@listserv.ieee.org cc:
Subject: [BP] Parameter input
to signaling spreadsheet
|
Additional parameters for signaling spreadsheet
(1) Input referred device noise
(2) Input referred offset
(3) Input referred environmental
noise
(4) Reference level sampling error
(5) Reference level generation error
(6) Ensuring that eye-width is measured at
the 1/2 eye height point.
(7) Listing of all tap values after
adaptation
(4) and (5) are specific imperfections that
result from multi-level
signaling. To set a multi-level
threshold, a circuit needs to measure
something (4) and a circuit needs to use
the measurement to generate
the threshold (5). Both of
these will
have errors.
(6) is also a multi-level issue.
Multi-level eyes are symmetric in
voltage and time but not simultaneously.
The widest eye-width is not
at the center of the eye-height. We
need to ensure the results are
not the result of taking
the best of both.
Thanks,
Brian T. Brunn
Xilinx, Communications Technology Division
805 Las Cimas Pkwy #250
Austin, TX 78746
brian.brunn@xilinx.com
512-634-1304