Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [BP] Dielectric Weave effects



I am not currently aware of any systematic study of differential pair 
skew on production backplanes, due to the problem of accurate 
instrumentation of hundreds of channels.  However, there are occasional 
anecdotal measurements that have been made by some connector vendors on 
customer backplanes which have shown 40 to 50 ps skew from time to time 
on high BER channels.  Teradyne and Teraspeed Consulting will begin 
conducting a systematic study of backplane length differential pair skew 
this summer, on a variety of standard backplane stackup and trace 
configurations.  That data should be available by fall, and allow us to 
set some fundamental skew limits on weave-parallel routed tracks and 
off-angle tracks.  I believe that Intel Labs is also involved in a 
similar study.   However, I believe thate Rich is correct. A theoretical 
upper skew bound of 6 ps/in does currently exist for many stackup, 
material and trace geometry combinations.  In addition, a lower skew 
asymptotic bound for optimal routing strategies w.r.t. the weave has 
been shown to exist, but has not been adequately quantified by anyone 
that I am aware of.  However, this may eventually prove to be elusive 
due to low level defects in the fiberglass structure and non-uniform 
epoxy Er.

It is my belief that when laminate weave skew is placed into the mix and 
common mode conversion is properly accounted for, non-NRZ encoding 
schemes may have enough UI headroom to ultimately outperform NRZ 
signaling, in the worst cases.  However, this is only a hunch and not 
yet substantiated.  However, I think it behooves the committee to 
consider laminate weave skew in the specification.  It is my considered 
position that a total differential skew specification of 20 ps in an 
end-to-end system is not achievable on epoxy/glass composites without 
extra ordinary efforts and license of (or violation of) at least one 
major patent in this area.

There is yet another possibility that may hold promise.  Electronic skew 
pre-compensation may very well allow channels to work in the presence of 
moderate amounts of differential skew.

Regards,

Scott

Scott McMorrow
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
121 North River Drive
Narragansett, RI 02882
(401) 284-1827 Business
(401) 284-1840 Fax

http://www.teraspeed.com

Teraspeed® is the registered service mark of
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC



b_panos wrote:

>Yea, S McMorrow et al.
>The thing is, it really depends on things like material, bundle size, glass
>dia. to trace width and separation, as well as the orientation and the
>length of trace. To be quite honest, if skew is bad enough, it wouldn't meet
>ISI levels and the eye wouldn't be recoverable. The RT of a 10G signal is
>going to be on the order of 50ps. so any skew approaching this level, your
>RL is going to look terrible, not to mention your S21 results. Just my
>2cents
>
>Regards
>Bill
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-stds-802-3-blade@ieee.org
>[mailto:owner-stds-802-3-blade@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Mellitz, Richard
>Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 1:43 PM
>To: STDS-802-3-BLADE@listserv.ieee.org
>Subject: [BP] Dielectric Weave effects
>
>
>Hi All,
>I started reviewing the draft doc and came across a differential skew
>spec of 20 ps. Has any one actually measured skew on the published
>backplanes?
>
>It's possible to get up 6ps/inch skew in a pair due to bundle weave. Do
>we need to address this issue?
>
>These effects have been published before.
>
>Rich Mellitz
>Intel Corporation
>
>
>  
>