We will talk about it at the meeting, when we get to channel bonding and scheduling …
Regards
Marek Hajduczenia, PhD, CCNA CSCO12874393
Network Architect, Principal Engineer
Bright House Networks
From: Francois Menard [mailto:fmenard@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 5:35 PM
To: Marek Hajduczenia; STDS-802-3-NGEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [802.3_NGEPON] 25G ONU Options to increase Network Capacity
Marek,
… which does not seem to be not within the scope of the project as of today. I’m not suggesting it cannot be done, but this solution does not address project goals: this will always remain 25Gx4, with maximum rate per ONU of 25G.
I fear there is something which I do not understand about the co-existence of 25G ONUs with 50G ONUs and 100G ONUs on the same PON.
Why would a 25G ONU on λ1 or λ2 or λ3 prevent a 50G ONU on λ0+λ1 from working, or for a 100G ONU from working on λ0 + λ1 + λ2 + λ3 ?
I could understand if 50G ONUs are introduced on on λ1+λ2 and do not require that 25G ONUs quiet down on λ0.
However, 100G ONUs will require that λ0 be quiet down.
So I fail to see your point.
My understanding is that:
A 50G ONU will work in the presence of tunable ONUs on λ0 or λ1
A 100G ONU will work in the presence of tunable ONUs on λ0 or λ1 or λ2 or λ3
F.