| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Duane, To answer your question: >Do
you think we will need more gain that what is provided in the
existing 10G RS FEC? No
Regards, Bill -------- Forwarded Message --------
True,
other than a resolution to adopt the same envelope structure
we passed quite a while ago we haven’t talked about 10G US
much. Do you think we will need more gain that what is
provided in the existing 10G RS FEC? Best
Regards Duane From:
Bill Powell [mailto:bill.powell@xxxxxxxxx]
Duane, Regards,
Bill, Personally
I don’t think the 10G US will need that much of a boost.
Hopefully we can reference much of the current spec for
10G US. Best
Regards Duane From:
Bill Powell [mailto:bill.powell@xxxxxxxxx]
Duane, Marek, Regards,
Thank
you, Duane
Item
1) will be fixed and it was clearly a mistake on my end.
As
far as item 2) goes, this change will affect all new
clauses as well – I think it would be better to have a
comment on this topic against D1.1 to make sure it gets
addressed correctly. Marek From:
Duane Remein
<Duane.Remein@xxxxxxxxxx>
Marek, Only
noticed two items of importance:
1)
Pg
1/35 line 53 “Nx25G-EPONs using the nominal bit rate of
10, 25, or 25 Gb/s use a mandatory FEC function defined
in Clause 142 in any direction.” Probably not for 10G
and the 2nd “25” should be “50” I suspect.
2)
For
Fig 56-5a pg 2/36 We should add a note to these figures
that 10G US will not use 25GMII but 10GMII in US. Let
me know if this needs to be a separate comment. Best
Regards Duane From:
Marek Hajduczenia [mailto:mxhajduczenia@xxxxxxxxx]
Dear colleagues, Attached please find the proposed
changes against Clause 56 to accommodate Nx25G-EPON in
the EFM architecture. All changes to Clause 56
material (where needed) are tracked in terms of
additions and deletion. Material that does not need to
be modified is NOT included in this contribution. I plan to submit a comment against
draft D1.1 (once published) including this material as
a contribution towards the draft. Please review and
provide feedback. Your review is more than welcome. regards Marek To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-NGEPON list, click the
following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-NGEPON&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-NGEPON list, click the
following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-NGEPON&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-NGEPON list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-NGEPON&A=1 |