| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Motion #8 from New Orleans meeting in May 2017:
The upstream channel format of the asymmetric 25/10G ONU shall be identical to the upstream channel format of the 25/25G ONU with the exception of line rate which shall be 10.3125 GBd.
Moved: Glen Kramer Second: Wait for it …. Bill Powell !!!
For: 16 Against: 0 Abstain: 19 Technical (≥ 75%) Motion Passed
-Glen
From: Bill Powell [mailto:bill.powell@xxxxxxxxx]
Duane, To answer your question: >Do you think we will need more gain that what is provided in the existing 10G RS FEC? No
True, other than a resolution to adopt the same envelope structure we passed quite a while ago we haven’t talked about 10G US much. Do you think we will need more gain that what is provided in the existing 10G RS FEC? Best Regards Duane
From: Bill Powell [mailto:bill.powell@xxxxxxxxx]
Duane, Regards,
Bill, Personally I don’t think the 10G US will need that much of a boost. Hopefully we can reference much of the current spec for 10G US. Best Regards Duane
From: Bill Powell [mailto:bill.powell@xxxxxxxxx]
Duane, Marek, Regards,
Thank you, Duane
Item 1) will be fixed and it was clearly a mistake on my end.
As far as item 2) goes, this change will affect all new clauses as well – I think it would be better to have a comment on this topic against D1.1 to make sure it gets addressed correctly.
Marek
From: Duane Remein <Duane.Remein@xxxxxxxxxx>
Marek, Only noticed two items of importance: 1) Pg 1/35 line 53 “Nx25G-EPONs using the nominal bit rate of 10, 25, or 25 Gb/s use a mandatory FEC function defined in Clause 142 in any direction.” Probably not for 10G and the 2nd “25” should be “50” I suspect. 2) For Fig 56-5a pg 2/36 We should add a note to these figures that 10G US will not use 25GMII but 10GMII in US. Let me know if this needs to be a separate comment. Best Regards Duane
From: Marek Hajduczenia [mailto:mxhajduczenia@xxxxxxxxx]
Dear colleagues,
Attached please find the proposed changes against Clause 56 to accommodate Nx25G-EPON in the EFM architecture. All changes to Clause 56 material (where needed) are tracked in terms of additions and deletion. Material that does not need to be modified is NOT included in this contribution.
I plan to submit a comment against draft D1.1 (once published) including this material as a contribution towards the draft. Please review and provide feedback. Your review is more than welcome.
regards
Marek To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-NGEPON list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-NGEPON&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-NGEPON list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-NGEPON&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-NGEPON list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-NGEPON&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-NGEPON list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-NGEPON&A=1 |