On May 21, 2019, at 3:56 PMPDT, George Zimmerman <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:As a last reminder, if you have any additional “EZ” or “Editorial” comments to pull from the bucket, please let us know ASAP.
Please remove from EZ
i-20 Change resolution
From: Delete the editor's note.
To: Delete the editor's note and update reference at what ever is expected to be the final recirculation.
Keep for the time being. Editor to check for update to reference before each draft is published
i-68 Looks like mixed units. Discuss at mtg.
i-73 US style does not have the comma he seeks to add.
i-74 What is 802.3 style for this, We should follow.
i-78 US style does not have the comma he seeks to add.
i-146 Change to AIP. "triplet" is misspelled in remedy
i-121 Change from ACCEPT to AIP
i-125 US style does not have the comma he seeks to add.
i-137 US style does not have the comma he seeks to add.
i-141 US style does not have the comma he seeks to add.
i-152 Looks like mixed units. Discuss at mtg.
i-162 "triplet" is misspelled in remedy
i-243 Still doesn't do a comparison. It might if you said the device specified in this clause ...to other Physical Layer clauses. Grammar needs tweaking.
i-251 Disagree. Discuss.
i-326 Says AIP but provides no text other than the balloter proposed solution
i-361, i-362, i-366 Remedy doesn't provide for fully adhering to the established format. (I think you need to add the word "values")
i-422 Change format as for other instances
EDITORIAL COMMENTS to be pulled for discussion
i-207 Front matter is included for comment. The only restriction is that it can not be "required" as in the basis for a DISAPPROVE ballot.
The fact that it is copied from a template or is an unaltered copy from the revision is not a valid cause for rejection.
i-208 Front matter is included for comment. The only restriction is that it can not be "required" as in the basis for a DISAPPROVE ballot.
The fact that it is copied from a template or is an unaltered copy from the revision is not a valid cause for rejection.
i-263 The following illustrates what was seen on my (I strongly believe) unaltered draft that I downloaded.
If it doesn't appear in anybody else's draft I will withdraw this comment.
i-274
That's all for now but I do have more "editorial" to go through.
Geoff
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-10SPE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-10SPE&A=1