[802.3_10SPE] Please remove two comments from the EZ-Bucket

[Valerie Maguire <Valerie_Maguire@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Please remove comment i-72 from EZ bucket.

 

Error in proposed resolution – should have been proposed Accept.

 

Please remove comment i-75 from EZ bucket.

 

Error in proposed resolution – should have been proposed Accept in Principle with proposed remedy.

 

 

Valerie Maguire, BSEE

602-228-7943 mobile

 

www.siemon.com

 

From: Geoff Thompson <thompson@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 9:15 PM
To: STDS-802-3-10SPE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [802.3_10SPE] 802.3cg plan for Wednesday

 

George-

 

On May 21, 2019, at 3:56 PMPDT, George Zimmerman <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 

As a last reminder, if you have any additional “EZ” or “Editorial” comments to pull from the bucket, please let us know ASAP.

 

Please remove from EZ

 

i-20        Change resolution 

                             From:    Delete the editor's note.

                             To:                       Delete the editor's note and update reference at what ever is expected to be the final recirculation.

                                                          Keep for the time being.  Editor to check for update to reference before each draft is published

 

i-68        Looks like mixed units.  Discuss at mtg.

 

i-73        US style does not have the comma he seeks to add.

 

i-74        What is 802.3 style for this,  We should follow.

 

i-78 US style does not have the comma he seeks to add.

 

i-146 Change to AIP.  "triplet" is misspelled in remedy

 

i-121     Change from ACCEPT to AIP

 

i-125 US style does not have the comma he seeks to add.

 

i-137 US style does not have the comma he seeks to add.

 

i-141 US style does not have the comma he seeks to add.

 

i-152     Looks like mixed units.  Discuss at mtg.

 

i-162     "triplet" is misspelled in remedy

 

i-243     Still doesn't do a comparison.  It might if you said the device specified in this clause ...to other Physical Layer clauses.  Grammar needs tweaking.

 

i-251     Disagree.  Discuss.

 

i-326     Says AIP but provides no text other than the balloter proposed solution

 

i-361, i-362, i-366            Remedy doesn't  provide for fully adhering to the established format.  (I think you need to add the word "values")

 

i-422     Change format as for other instances

 

EDITORIAL COMMENTS to be pulled for discussion

 

i-207     Front matter is included for comment.  The only restriction is that it can not be "required" as in the basis for a DISAPPROVE ballot.

                             The fact that it is copied from a template or is an unaltered copy from the revision is not a valid cause for rejection.

 

i-208     Front matter is included for comment.  The only restriction is that it can not be "required" as in the basis for a DISAPPROVE ballot.

                             The fact that it is copied from a template or is an unaltered copy from the revision is not a valid cause for rejection.

 

i-263     The following illustrates what was seen on my (I strongly believe) unaltered draft that I downloaded.

                             If it doesn't appear in anybody else's draft I will withdraw this comment.

 

 

i-274

 

 

That's all for now but I do have more "editorial" to go through.

 

Geoff

 

 

--
This message has been checked by ESVA and is believed to be clean.  If you think this message is actually spam, please choose one of the options below.  Blacklisting will cause email from this sender to never show up in you inbox again. 
Click here to mark it as spam.
Click here to blacklist sender

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-10SPE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-10SPE&A=1

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-10SPE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-10SPE&A=1