| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Dear Yong, With regards to this matter, note please that I wrote a simulator of T1S with PLCA from scratch that follows the normative part of the draft with high fidelity. Among others, motivations of creating this was to:
Some of the comments submitted by Piergiorgio and me since January were based on the output of this system. The simulator has been continuously updated at each round, following the accepted changes, and I am currently working on adding 3.2 (accepted) and 3.3 (proposed) changes to it, including what Piergiorgio sent earlier. My intention is to
provide feedback by Milwaukee. Should you have any questions/comments, please feel free to get back to me. Yours sincerely Gergely From: Yong Kim <yongkim.mail@xxxxxxxxx> Hi Piergiorgio, With regard to "PLCA DATA State Diagram caused by comment i-373 on D3.0. The intention of i-373 resolution was to clarify the behaviour of the State Diagram without changing the functionality." Did a particular "victim/volunteer" do his usual verilog simulation on this to help validate this for you yet? If not, before the interim? best regards, Yong Kim, affiliation: NIO On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 2:09 PM Piergiorgio Beruto <piergiorgio.beruto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-10SPE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-10SPE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-10SPE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-10SPE&A=1 |