| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi John, Thanks. The specification is uni-directional from TP2 to TP3, not pre-cluding bi-directional operation. I would be surprised if you could meet our application of 80km without OAs. Kind regards, Peter From: John DeAndrea [mailto:John.DeAndrea@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Hi John, Steve and Peter, One comment on the proposed remedy, Page 2. Bullet 1.
-
Term “”unidirectional” This term is technically valid for black links which include optical amplifiers. Typically, isolators are used within optical amplifiers, which creates the uni-directional behavior. Our use case for black link
also includes implementations without optical amplifiers. In those use cases, the passive mux and demux filters, and cable plant, would support bi-directional optical carriers. Therefore, you might consider dropping the term ‘unidirectional” as one option,
or clarification on this aspect in the text. Regards, John DeAndrea From: John D'Ambrosia <jdambrosia@xxxxxxxxx>
All, At last week’s meeting we did not finish comment #83, which discussed the black link methodology.
Please see the attached presentation that will be discussed on Thursday that seeks to close out Comment #83. Please use the reflector to discuss the presentation to assist in reaching consensus and closing comment. My thanks to my co-authors – Steve / Peter for helping to progress this. Regards John D’Ambrosia To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-DWDM list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-DWDM&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-DWDM list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-DWDM&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-DWDM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-DWDM&A=1 |