Re: [802.3_100G-OPTX] Status update and proposed comment resolution ord

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Thread Links

Date Links

Re: [802.3_100G-OPTX] Status update and proposed comment resolution order for 802.3cu Interim Teleconference - Tues 4/21

To: STDS-802-3-100G-OPTX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: [802.3_100G-OPTX] Status update and proposed comment resolution order for 802.3cu Interim Teleconference - Tues 4/21

From: "Gary Nicholl (gnicholl)" <00000bb92642e11e-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:56:04 +0000

Accept-language: en-US

Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none

Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=rTHiGq0hlczdtaNF2c/rL5whBWWBHfnF7H8pDPuWHq8=; b=XPKfx/8DuKw8wnqYXG8d3uBelqSQy7Byzh7i6uIkZlxMzyVlrS1lE3p9CHyM9PdBopOgkEuP652YI0srm1t3YtI9vIoeGnrRC9aBA+YFFcsuxK7CBKv2i5jZ2518Cn+B41jZwH/exetj/wLVknRskyM1aX83C3MMGVUkE8jRWFWCJPhaqmK9Ek3kVQ6diHms4eEZiuRSjqgUCSerkJ3+xQWzKThHmbEYncdikNE+4gGWH5eNB8kc4otTClVERqQRtmiC8JIrg31YnqGtKhlVtvAzKkRsajLX9VF5nXQdQdbKMEOZkHZ1UyYo/E2JoVSJDDbWxgpW+yPeHQgE1iclwQ==

Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=RKRo/8D3GxhUqhUMG75u1EdckV9LL+tGRrYI7SLG3f+g+GAw91YZX1hPM6p+GXnZ9VirqokjIJAoMqE2dbeEd//H9zWk6DFdBFoQfZ6iZzXrzebZSITaNE5ysQj6q4CV4+5ZpZsdlAnfiDSaFZRzHVjd5duXZqreEzmY8heL2PVmjTxAXWWVPNPRcvdcPZFIsO4K3E/UngenmSqYhn2TznQJyLWibDroFBgDeZe2gGfkV3mHj2F6VNsRE/BAPG7iT1ER1nA1UJsBoGzBEOdX+ZDDUf5PaC6Fzj+nbrAagyhl2IekBZ6xfB0sntjSqvcenkakCYCqy1bI+w2q/ddr9w==

Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Delivered-to: STDS-802-3-100G-OPTX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 emlpav01.ieee.org 03LDuL3J013063

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee.org; s=mail; t=1587477381; bh=JS9jBCzjGppNHx9VqzDtrRNXQWjNt2RYiDSqnM3HReA=; h=References:Date:Reply-To:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Owner:From; b=YLfg/SHBkRYoxuj215fZ3+WINw1DZiSy1c0/tN6brQIC6cAAh+rcNuq1F5jeEZ8lX 6+IIgnin0m2PWKbYnLO13sNRWCxWEIv9ODrdT4macGL64f9t3wMNeUb2YKaT/SmE7Z XQpookPiW8YbEBTBrSSpItkDXu0Hcvxq0yl56+Qg=

In-reply-to: <0fb36adeb6fa487bba1f02a427c45e0d@huawei.com>

Ironport-phdr: 9a23:tzP0Mhfi2U2yYEhuDZDPk6NnlGMj4e+mNxMJ6pchl7NFe7ii+JKnJkHE+PFxlwGQD57D5adCjOzb++D7VGoM7IzJkUhKcYcEFnpnwd4TgxRmBceEDUPhK/u/YCo7F8RFUFtN9HCgOk8TE8H7NBXf

List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-802-3-100G-OPTX>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-802-3-100G-OPTX>

List-owner: <mailto:STDS-802-3-100G-OPTX-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>

List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-802-3-100G-OPTX-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>

List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-802-3-100G-OPTX-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>

References: <BYAPR11MB29332889DD540AE7BEB1A6DEC4D40@BYAPR11MB2933.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <0fb36adeb6fa487bba1f02a427c45e0d@huawei.com>

Reply-to: "Gary Nicholl (gnicholl)" <gnicholl@xxxxxxxxx>

Thread-index: AdYXYkl3DSSZtNv1TS2w9mdd0YBv8gAYfyzQAAgR3XA=

Thread-topic: [802.3_100G-OPTX] Status update and proposed comment resolution order for 802.3cu Interim Teleconference - Tues 4/21

Thanks for the feedback Peter. Let’s review further on the call.

Gary

From: Peter Stassar <Peter.Stassar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 6:07 AM
To: Gary Nicholl (gnicholl) <gnicholl@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: STDS-802-3-100G-OPTX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [802.3_100G-OPTX] Status update and proposed comment resolution order for 802.3cu Interim Teleconference - Tues 4/21

Hi Gary,

Thanks.

I do have a comment with respect to the wording in the response to comment #113.

It currently says:

“"With the Gaussian noise generator on and the sinusoidal jitter and sinusoidal interferer turned off, the RINxx.xOMA of the SRS test source (where xx.x is the value for optical return loss tolerance from Table 151-7) shall be no greater than the value specified in Table 151-7 for 400GBASE-FR4 and 400GBASE-LR4-6."

I don’t think the bit “shall be no greater than” is really appropriate wording.

What do you mean with a “great value”? A fabulous value?

Probably better to say:

“"With the Gaussian noise generator on and the sinusoidal jitter and sinusoidal interferer turned off, the RINxx.xOMA of the SRS test source (where xx.x is the value for optical return loss tolerance from Table 151-7) shall not be larger than the value specified in Table 151-7 for 400GBASE-FR4 and 400GBASE-LR4-6."

Or similar.

Kind regards,

Peter

From: Gary Nicholl (gnicholl) [mailto:00000bb92642e11e-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 12:24 AM
To: STDS-802-3-100G-OPTX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.3_100G-OPTX] Status update and proposed comment resolution order for 802.3cu Interim Teleconference - Tues 4/21

Please see below for the comment resolution order for tomorrow’s interim conference call (4/21).

I would appreciate it if the commenters (and ideally anyone with an interest/opinion on a specific topic) could review the proposed comment responses ( http://www.ieee802.org/3/cu/comments/index.html) ahead of the call tomorrow, and if you have any questions or concerns with the proposed response please contact the editorial team and/or send a message to the reflector.

We are down to the last 3 comments (excluding the bucket), so are expecting to be able to close comment resolution tomorrow.

Here is the link to the latest comment agenda slides (including the latest status update).

http://www.ieee802.org/3/cu/public/March20/nicholl_3cu_01a_042120.pdf

Thanks in advance,

Gary Nicholl

Chief Editor, IEEE 802.3cu Task Force

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-100G-OPTX list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-100G-OPTX&A=1