Re: [802.3EEESG] straw polls and motions for Wednesday and Thusday
At 05:36 PM 3/13/2007 , Mike Bennett wrote:
>Mike Bennett wrote:
>>Folks,
>>
>>I strongly encourage you to work on straw polls and motions for
>>objectives you are considering to bring forward to the study group. I
>>will recap the straw polls from the interim meeting to show where we have
>>consensus. I will poll the group based on what I think looks like
>>objectives in the material presented earlier today, but this may or may
>>not be what you have in mind. Please let me know if you're going to poll
>>the group or bring in motions so don't duplicate efforts.
>I meant to say "so we don't duplicate efforts".
>
>Also, we heard presentations and discussion suggesting that 20 msec is a
>more realistic number for transition time. I'm trying to come up with an
>objective that captures the idea without excluding other options.
>Something like:
>
>The EEESG should adopt the following project objective:
>
> The transition time during Rapid PHY selection shall be as low as
> possible.
Mike-
I don't think this is quite what we need.
If we can't do the transition in a fast and transparent enough manner to
avoid dropping a connection (even if it is as quickly "as possible") then
we don't have a project.
Geoff
>I know there must be more to it than that, so please speak up if you have
>ideas as to how to word this.
>Mike
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Mike
>
>
>--
>Michael J. Bennett
>Chair, IEEE 802.3 Energy Efficient Ethernet Study Group