Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: [EFM] EFM Requirements

To: bob.barrett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [EFM] EFM Requirements
From: Fletcher E Kittredge <fkittred@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 17:40:50 -0400
cc: "Geoff Thompson" <gthompso@nortelnetworks.com>, "Faye Ly" <faye@salira.com>, "Harry Hvostov" <HHvostov@luminous.com>, "Sherman Ackley" <SAckley@nrtc.org>, "stds-802-3-efm" <stds-802-3-efm@ieee.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 22 Aug 2001 17:20:04 BST." <NFBBIIGLOGBFPMGAJKKEEECJDFAA.bob.barrett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "Geoff Thompson" <gthompso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Faye Ly" <faye@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-stds-802-3-efm@majordomo.ieee.org

On Wed, 22 Aug 2001 17:20:04 +0100  "Bob Barrett" wrote:
> RB - this is very similar to how the T1 CSU/DSU demarc works (and has worked
> exceptionally well for many years). It is a good model to leverage.

Personally, I would be real wary of adopting any legacy telco model,
as in my niche the legacy telco model is losing badly to the Internet
or Cable models.

So, I accept this as your opinion, but not as undisputable fact.

regards,
fletcher

References:
- RE: [EFM] EFM Requirements
  - From: Bob Barrett

Prev by Date: [EFM] TEST Message
Next by Date: Re: [EFM] EFM Requirements
Prev by thread: RE: [EFM] EFM Requirements
Next by thread: RE: [EFM] EFM Requirements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread