| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Comment below
-----Original Message-----
From: Horne, David M [mailto:david.m.horne@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 12:10 PM
To: 'carlosal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; Roy Bynum
Cc: 'stds-802-3-efm-p2mp@ieee.org'; 'stds-802-3-efm@ieee.org'
Subject: RE: [EFM] RE: [EFM-P2MP] Point-to-Point plus Shared Media
my comments in-line, after the ">>>"
--Dave Horne
-----Original Message-----
From: carlosal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:carlosal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 10:13 AM
To: Roy Bynum
Cc: Horne, David M; 'Angeloni Cesare, IT';
'stds-802-3-efm-p2mp@ieee.org'; 'stds-802-3-efm@ieee.org'
Subject: Re: [EFM] RE: [EFM-P2MP] Point-to-Point plus Shared Media
SNIP......
Another potential development would be to use the ranging information to
sort the transmission sequence. By this method, stations closer together
would transmit in sequence, thus increasing the performance of the network.
Simulations can tell us if the performance gain is significant.
>>>>Just curious how you get inter end station range from headend ranging
unless you have knowledge of topology. Note I'm assuming cascaded splitters.
Two CLE''s could be the same distance form the head end, but could be separated
by the splitter closest to the head end, and hence be max possible distance apart?
Bill Crick
Nortel Networks