[EFM] [Fwd: [802SEC] FW: [New-work] WG Review: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (bfd)]
-------- Original Message --------
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 09:07:10 -0700
From: "Congdon, Paul T (ProCurve)" <paul.congdon@HP.COM>
Subject: [802SEC] FW: [New-work] WG Review: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (bfd)
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
New work proposal in the IETF that may be of interest to IEEE 802
groups. Chairs forward to your group if appropriate.
-----Original Message-----
From: new-work-admin@ietf.org [mailto:new-work-admin@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of The IESG
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 7:34 AM
To: new-work@ietf.org
Subject: [New-work] WG Review: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (bfd)
A new IETF working group has been proposed in the Routing Area. The IESG
has not
made any determination as yet. The following description was submitted,
and is
provided for informational purposes only. Please send your comments to
the IESG
mailing list (iesg@ietf.org) by May 26th.
Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (bfd)
----------------------------------------
Description of Working Group:
The BFD Working Group is chartered to specify a protocol for
bidirectional forwarding detection (BFD), as well as extensions to be
used within the scope of BFD and IP routing, or protocols such as MPLS
that are based on IP routing, in a way that will encourage multiple,
inter-operable vendor implementations.
BFD is a protocol intended to detect faults in the bidirectional path
between two forwarding engines, including physical interfaces,
subinterfaces, data link(s), and to the extent possible the forwarding
engines themselves, with potentially very low latency. It operates
independently of media, data protocols, and routing protocols. An
additional goal is to provide a single mechanism that can be used for
liveness detection over any media, at any protocol layer, with a wide
range of detection times and overhead, to avoid a proliferation of
different methods.
Important characteristics of BFD include:
- Simple, fixed-field encoding to facilitate implementations in
hardware
- Independence of the data protocol being forwarded between two
systems.
BFD packets are carried as the payload of whatever encapsulating
protocol
is appropriate for the medium and network.
- Path independence: BFD can provide failure detection on any kind
of path
between systems, including direct physical links, virtual
circuits, tunnels,
MPLS LSPs, multihop routed paths, and unidirectional links (so
long
as there is some return path, of course.)
- Ability to be bootstrapped by any other protocol that
automatically forms
peer, neighbor or adjacency relationships to seed BFD endpoint
discovery.
At this time the WG is chartered to complete the following work items
(additional items will require rechartering):
1. Develop the base BFD protocol specification and submit it to the
IESG
for publication as a Proposed Standard
2. Document BFD encapsulation and usage profile for single-hop IPv4
and IPv6
adjacencies (e.g, physical links and IP/GRE tunnels for static
routes,
IS-IS, OSPFv2, OSPFv3, single-hop BGP) and submit the
specification to the
IESG for publication as a Proposed Standard.
3. Document BFD encapsulation and usage profile for MPLS LSPs and
submit
the specification to the IESG for publication as a Proposed
Standard.
4. Develop the MIB module for BFD and submit it to the IESG for
publication
as a Proposed Standard.
5. Document BFD encapsulation and usage profile for multi-hop IPv4
and IPv6
adjacencies (e.g. OSPF virtual links and iBGP sessions) and
submit
the specification to the IESG for publication as a Proposed
Standard.
Topics for Possible Future Work:
1. Document BFD directly over 802.3 in close collaboration and
synchronization
with the IEEE.
_______________________________________________
New-work mailing list
New-work@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/new-work
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by
Listserv.