Re: [EFM] Bug in definition of OAMDiscoveryState values (Annex 30 B)

[Matt Squire <MSquire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

 

Open mouth, insert work.  Remind me to shut up next time. 

 

Yes, I'll contact David and take the action item to follow-up.

 

- Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: Geoff Thompson [mailto:gthompso@nortelnetworks.com]
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 8:49 AM
To: Matt Squire
Cc: STDS-802-3-EFM@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG; David_Law@eur.3com.com
Subject: Re: [EFM] Bug in definition of OAMDiscoveryState values (Annex 30 B)

Matt-

So does that mean that you will take the action item to file a Maint Req with David to get it fixed?

Geoff

At 07:15 AM 7/29/2004 -0700, Matt Squire wrote:

>
> Dear EFMers,
>
> It seems to me that there is a missing enumerated value in
> the definition of
> OAMDiscoveryState in Annex 30B on page 193 of draft 3.3.
> There are only 5
> states listed in that definition, with the value for "send
> local remote OK"
> missing.  In 30.3.6.1.4 (page 49), aOAMDiscoveryState is
> shown with all 6
> values (agreeing with the definition in clause 57, figure
> 57-5 on page 231).
>

Me thinks you are correct.  I think this stuff changed in D3.1 and we didn't update 30B.

- Matt