Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

AW: [EFM-P2MP] conference call details




Hi Ariel,
 
Regarding point 8 below, please not the inclusion in Cl 58 of text at P156 l
26 and the 
definition of a new primitive PMD_SIGNAL.request, also on P156
 
Tom
 
 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Ariel Maislos [mailto:ariel.maislos@passave.com]
Gesendet am: Montag, 14. April 2003 14:55
An: P2MP Reflector
Betreff: [EFM-P2MP] conference call details


Dear EPON colleagues,

 

At our last conference call we reviewed a list of action items to be covered
prior to our next meeting.

Our intention is to scrub our document, and harmonizing the three EPON
clauses 58, 64 and 65.

Currently the AI list includes:

1.	We have removed the OMP block as of draft 1.4, however the some of
the inter block communication paradigms still rely on OMP.xyz primitives.
TransmitFrame should be used consistently as an outbound interface; while
the inbound interface should be consistent with the "opcode specific
function activation" paradigm. 

2.	Diagram  64-3 is not required, as it is redundant with the updated
diagram 64-2 

3.	References to variable - Master need to be removed 

4.	Description of Shared LAN Emulation in 64.3.4.2 needs to be
reviewed. 

5.	Textual description of processes in 64.3.3 requires further review
to reflect advancements in Draft 1.4 

6.	Description of client interfaces should be collected to a single
location under 64.3.11 "Service Interfaces". This would collect all client
interfaces from their present locations under 64.3.8, 64.3.9, and 64.3.10 

7.	Scrub for consistency of interfaces with Clause 65 (LLID
interfaces). 

8.	Scrub for consistency of interfaces with Clause 58 (laser control
signal). 

9.	Scrub language in text to insert "Shall" to appropriate locations. 

10.	Update definitions of watchdog behavior in ONU (based on received
Gates) and OLT (based on received Reports). Formerly the watchdog was
located at the OMP block, now it should reside at the Gate Processing or the
Report Processing for the ONU and the OLT respectively. 

11.	Review definitions and abbreviations at opening of Clause 64 and 65
prior to insertion into Clause 1. 

12.	Issue rose at last meeting regarding jabber like functionality for
PMD. 

13.	Open comments on Draft 1.3. 

14.	Address all the Editor's notes throughout document. 

 

At our next call we shall begin reviewing proposed solutions to issues
raised. Volunteers are sought to help take ownership of AI from the list.

 

Regards,

            Ariel

 

Ariel Maislos

Passave Inc.

1557 Jasper Dr.

Sunnyvale, CA 94087

ariel.maislos@passave.com

Tel: (408) 530 0458 Cel: (408) 242 8599