[STDS-802-3-EPOC] ePoll results for: Unofficial IEEE P802.3bn Task Force eStraw Poll #rfspectrum_7
Online straw poll closed at 2013-05-31 18:00:00 for:
Unofficial IEEE P802.3bn Task Force eStraw Poll #rfspectrum_7
4K FFT exclusion sub-band increment Question: (formatted for text):
"The increment in subcarriers for an internal exclusion sub-band
above the minimum 20 subcarriers, for 4K FFT should be: [Note:
increment beyond the 1 MHz minimum as per Motion #19 5/16/13, TD
#58.] (Reference: ad hoc committee minutes: RF Spectrum_Minutes
5/28/13 )"
----------------------------------------------------
Vote type: Single answer selection per voter.
Summary of votes per answer (percent of total):
0) 1 subcarrier (50 kHz) = 9 (69.2%)
1) 2 subcarriers (100 kHz) = 1 (7.7%)
2) 4 subcarriers (200 kHz) = 0 (0.0%)
3) 5 subcarriers (250 kHz) = 0 (0.0%)
4) 10 subcarriers (500 kHz) = 0 (0.0%)
5) 20 subcarriers (1 MHz) = 1 (7.7%)
6) Other (provide answer in Comments) = 2 (15.4%)
Total votes = 13
________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-EPOC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-EPOC&A=1
"Full Name",Email,"Voting Member","Vote Date / Time",Answer,Comments
"Matthew Schmitt",m.schmitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-28 15:16:17",single:0:::::::,
"Marek Hajduczenia",marek.hajduczenia@xxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-28 15:17:43",single:::::::6:,abstain
"Hesham ElBakoury",hesham.elbakoury@xxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-28 15:19:04",single:0:::::::,
"Michel Allard",michel.allard@xxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-29 04:42:31",single:0:::::::,
"William Keasler",wkeasler@xxxxxxxxxx,N,"2013-05-29 07:56:16",single:0:::::::,
"Mike Darling",mike.darling@xxxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-29 08:37:51",single:0:::::::,
"Leo Montreuil",leo.montreuil@xxxxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-30 06:36:54",single::1::::::,
"Steve Shellhammer",sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-30 12:35:04",single:0:::::::,
"Avi Kliger",akliger@xxxxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-30 13:50:36",single:0:::::::,
"Duane Remein",duane.remein@xxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-31 07:06:39",single:::::::6:,"I could agree with any of the above but would like it be the same for 4k & 8k FFT sizes. IF this is not the case MDIO register meaning will be dependent on FFT size and I think that is an unnecessary complication. It\'s bad enough we have two FFT sizes."
"Bill Powell",bill.powell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-31 10:35:10",single:0:::::::,
"tom staniec",tom.staniec@xxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-31 13:41:04",single::::::5::,
"Saifur Rahman",saifur_rahman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-05-31 14:35:19",single:0:::::::,
________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-EPOC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-EPOC&A=1