Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Online straw poll closed at 2013-06-14 18:00:00 for: Unofficial IEEE P802.3bn Task Force eStraw Poll #rfspectrum_12 EPoC RF Spectrum for FDD Question: (formatted for text): "The EPoC standard for "upstream below downstream" Node 1 or higher operation shall support operation over the following frequency ranges: Downstream: 54 MHz to 1212 MHzUpstream: 5 MHz to 234 MHz The DS / US overlap region requires a diplexer. The EPoC specification will accommodate regionalization. This does not exclude above 1212 MHz, "high band overlay FDD", adjustment for TDD compatibility. (Refer to presentation: adhoc_rfspectrum_laubach_3bn_01_0613.pdf). (Reference: ad hoc committee minutes: RF Spectrum_Minutes 6/11/13 )" ---------------------------------------------------- Vote type: Single answer selection per voter. Summary of votes per answer (percent of total): 0) Agree = 14 (93.3%) 1) Disagree = 1 (6.7%) 2) Abstain = 0 (0.0%) Total votes = 15 ________________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-EPOC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-EPOC&A=1
"Full Name",Email,"Voting Member","Vote Date / Time",Answer,Comments "Marek Hajduczenia",marek.hajduczenia@xxxxxx,Y,"2013-06-12 00:26:27",single:0:::, "Michel Allard",michel.allard@xxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-06-12 05:22:03",single:0:::, "William Keasler",wkeasler@xxxxxxxxxx,N,"2013-06-12 05:44:09",single:0:::, "George Hart",george.hart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,N,"2013-06-12 07:04:58",single:0:::, "Hesham ElBakoury",hesham.elbakoury@xxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-06-12 10:06:26",single:0:::, "Mike Darling",mike.darling@xxxxxxx,Y,"2013-06-12 12:13:53",single:0:::, "Duane Remein",duane.remein@xxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-06-12 17:03:40",single:0:::, "Steve Shellhammer",sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-06-13 09:56:18",single:0:::, "Joe Solomon",joe_solomon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-06-13 13:58:23",single:0:::, "Bill Powell",bill.powell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-06-13 14:11:23",single:0:::,"As noted in the notes above, this does not exclude an FDD high-band overlay for a node+0 deployment case" "Mark Laubach",laubach@xxxxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-06-13 15:38:50",single:0:::, "Jorge Salinger",Jorge_salinger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-06-14 06:24:11",single:0:::, "Saifur Rahman",saifur_rahman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-06-14 06:26:52",single:0:::, "John Ulm",john.ulm@xxxxxxxxxx,Y,"2013-06-14 13:10:30",single::1::,"I don\'t see any reason why the downstream FDD spectrum needs to start at 54MHz, rather it should start around 300 or 400MHz, reducing # of octaves needed.If legacy services are present, they will be in the 54-400MHz range. If no legacy services present but multiple EPoC networks, maybe upstream should be 5 to 400MHz." "Keiji Tanaka",kj-tanaka@xxxxxxxxxxx,N,"2013-06-14 14:16:30",single:0:::,"This is a good compromise solution. We need an option of a 2.6 GHz frequency band for FDD. " ________________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-EPOC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-EPOC&A=1