| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi all, I might not be able to
attend the meeting so please see my response/opinion to the suggested remedies. Yair --------------------------- Comment #5: This type of oscillations
may cause heating damage to silicon at the PD or PSE due to the fact that the PD
may disconnect several times during short circuit condition and since PD may
loose its "memory" below 30V, consecutive startups may cause heating
problems. (This is not small signal
oscillations. This is motor boating behavior i.e. low frequency oscillations
that are function of PD load, PSE voltage, cable length and differences between
protection algorithms) So I believe that Caution
is the right choice. Comment #134: Accept the proposed
remedy. Comment 253: Slope is the effective
resistance as specified in line 27 hence the use of slope in the equation is
correct. The use of "V-I sope
and effective resistance ..." is redundant. Therefore Table 33-8
should be updated i.e. change "V-I slope" to "Slope…" Comment #131, #162 Accept the proposed
remedy. Comment 140: Within the concept of
allowing flexible system design and acknowledging the fact that "the system"
can use additional information beyond the classification methods (L1 and L2) the
proposed new text reflects this objective. Accept the proposed
remedy. Comment # 135, #136: Accept the proposed
remedy. Comment 168: OBE. (If Wael is not
satisfied he may comment on next draft..) Comment 173: The text as it is, is
clear and accurate. We can add links from
this text to the state diagram like we did in some locations for the PSE and PD. It is not possible to
cover all information in the state diagram we need the text for clarity. In addition, it is not
clear to me why it is difficult to write the PICs based on the current text. In the PICs you check if
PSE is using L2 or not. In the PICs you check if
PSE is doing 1 finger or 2 fingers If it is using L2 and has
1 finger it is compliant. If it doesn’t use
L2 and use 1 finger it is not compliant…. Reject this comment or
ask the commenter for complete remedy. Comment 199: The commenter is
adding text that infringes the classification baseline and the numerous voting
that failed around this issue since October 2007. To be specific:
In short: REJECT. -------------- End of my
response ---- Have Fun -------- From:
owner-stds-802-3-poep@IEEE.ORG [mailto:owner-stds-802-3-poep@IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of D. Please find
attached a presentation for tomorrow's editorial bucket ad hoc. The
teleconference announcement is found below, as well as on the STDS-802-3-POEP
reflector archive at the following URL: |